The House of the Lord: A Study of Holy Sanctuaries Ancient and ModernTalmage, James E. (James Edward)
Religion
The House of the Lord: A Study of Holy Sanctuaries Ancient and Modern
Talmage, James E. (James Edward)
Latter Day Saint temples; Temples
Thus, during the reign of David there were two places regarded as
sanctuaries; and the worship of the people was divided. Solomon
appears to have acknowledged the sanctity of both places--the resting
place of the Ark at Jerusalem and the place of the Tabernacle of the
Congregation at Gibeon.[25] Through him both shrines were again brought
together.[26]
THE TEMPLE OF SOLOMON
Scarcely had the Ark of the Covenant been deposited at the capital
of the kingdom--the City of David,--when the king became desirous of
erecting for its accommodation a more enduring shelter than the tent
in which it had {31} been installed with pomp and ceremony. It appears
that the conscience of the king was troubled by the thought that he
was better housed than was the sanctuary of the Lord: "Now it came to
pass, as David sat in his house, that David said to Nathan the prophet,
Lo, I dwell in an house of cedars, but the ark of the covenant of the
Lord remaineth under curtains."[27] It was David's desire to build a
suitable House for the Lord and Nathan the prophet at first encouraged
the undertaking. The Lord spake to Nathan however, and directed him to
decline the king's proffered gift. Although Jehovah had been without a
fixed place recognized by the people as His, though as He said He had
not dwelt in a house amongst Israel, but had gone from tent to tent
and from one tabernacle to another,[28] though as the context implies,
the Lord had been neglected in the long delay attending the erection
of a house to His name, nevertheless David could not be honored with
the commission or even the permission to build such a house for he
was accounted a man of blood.[29] Let us not undertake to judge the
extent of David's offending; to do so would be to usurp the Divine
prerogative; it is enough for us to know that even the gift of royalty
may be declined if there be aught requiring reconciliation between the
mortal and his God. David, however, was permitted to provide means and
to gather material which afterward should be used in the erection of
the Temple,[30] moreover, the very site on which the great building
was subsequently erected was chosen and sanctified through his agency.
A great pestilence had fallen {32} upon Israel, and the Angel of the
Lord, sent forth with the warrant of destruction, was seen by David,
standing, sword in hand, on Mount Moriah at the threshing floor of
Araunah the Jebusite.[31] That spot, hallowed by the presence of a
heavenly messenger, though that messenger was the Angel of Death, was
marked by the erection of an altar, as the Lord directed through the
prophet Gad.[32]
As David realized that his years of life were few, he laid upon
Solomon, his son and chosen successor, the solemn charge to build the
house he had been forbidden to build. The king dwelt pathetically upon
his own disqualification, and then repeated the Lord's promise of
acceptance at the hand of Solomon. The scriptural record runs thus:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account