The House of the Lord: A Study of Holy Sanctuaries Ancient and ModernTalmage, James E. (James Edward)
Religion
The House of the Lord: A Study of Holy Sanctuaries Ancient and Modern
Talmage, James E. (James Edward)
Latter Day Saint temples; Temples
For the successful employment of such great numbers of workmen an
effective system of organization was necessary; we are not surprised,
therefore, in reading that thirty-three hundred overseers were in
service. The efficiency of the system is attested by the success
attending the great undertaking. The Israelites and the men of Tyre and
Sidon worked in harmony, and much of the building material was shaped
by pattern and measurement in forest and quarry; therefore "the house,
when it was in building, was built of stone made ready before it was
brought thither; so that there was neither hammer nor ax nor any tool
of iron heard in the house, while it was in building."[38]
Our primary source of information relating to the erection of the great
Temple is the scriptural record contained in I Kings, chapters 6 and
7; a later account appears in II Chronicles, chapter 3 and 4, which
account as {36} well as the description given by Josephus[39] appears
to have been derived from the record first cited.
In general, the design of Solomon's Temple was that of the specially
constructed Tabernacle of the Congregation, though the dimensions of
the Temple were double those of the Tabernacle. It will be remembered
that the porch of the Tabernacle was five cubits deep; that of
the Temple measured ten cubits in depth; in each case the porch
extended across the full width of the house. The Holy Place, or first
compartment within the walls, was twenty cubits long, ten cubits wide
and ten high in the Tabernacle; that of the Temple was forty by twenty
cubits and twenty cubits high. The inner sanctuary, Oracle, or Holy of
Holies, in the Tabernacle was cubical and measured ten cubits each way;
in the Temple this sacred enclosure was a cube of twenty cubits. Thus
the ground plan of the Tabernacle covered thirty-five by twenty cubits,
and that of the Temple seventy cubits by forty. These measurements
do not take into account the side chambers, which in the Tabernacle
were five cubits wide; those connected with the Temple measured ten
cubits in extreme width; with these included, the entire area of the
Tabernacle was forty by twenty cubits, and that of the Temple eighty
by forty cubits; or, at the usually accepted equivalent for the cubit,
sixty by thirty feet for the Tabernacle, and one hundred and twenty
feet by sixty feet for the Temple. In height the same relation was
maintained; the Tabernacle rose fifteen cubits and the Temple thirty
cubits. The Temple porch appears to have towered above the height of
the main structure.[40]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account