_The_ HUSBAND’S STORY The Husband’s Story A NOVEL BY DAVID GRAHAM PHILLIPS AUTHOR OF THE FASHIONABLE ADVENTURES OF JOSHUA CRAIG, OLD WIVES FOR NEW THE SECOND GENERATION, ETC. [Illustration] NEW YORK GROSSET & DUNLAP PUBLISHERS COPYRIGHT, 1910, BY D. APPLETON AND COMPANY _Published September, 1910_ Printed in the United States of America THE HUSBAND’S STORY WHY Several years ago circumstances thrust me into a position in which it became possible for the friend who figures in these pages as Godfrey Loring to do me a favor. He, being both wise and kindly, never misses a good chance to put another under obligations. He did me the favor. I gratefully, if reluctantly, acquiesced. Now, after many days, he collects. When you shall have read what follows, you may utterly reject my extenuating plea that any and every point of view upon life is worthy of attention, even though it serve only to confirm us in our previous ideas and beliefs. You may say that I should have repudiated my debt, should have refused to edit and publish the manuscript he confided to me. You may say that the general racial obligation to mankind--and to womankind--takes precedence over a private and personal obligation. Unfortunately I happen to be not of the philanthropic temperament. My sense of the personal is strong; my sense of the general weak--that is to say, weak in comparison. If “Loring” had been within reach, I think I should have gone to him and pleaded for release. But as luck will have it, he is off yachting, to peep about in the remote inlets and islets of Australasia and the South Seas for several years. To aggravate my situation, in the letter accompanying the manuscript, after several pages of the discriminating praise most dear to a writer’s heart, he did me the supreme honor of saying that in his work he had “striven to copy as closely as might be your style and your methods--to help me to the hearing I want and to lighten your labors as editor.” I assure him and the public that in any event I should have done little editing of his curious production beyond such as a proofreader might have found necessary. As it is, I have done practically no editing at all. In form and in substance, from title to finis, the work is his. I am merely its sponsor--and in circumstances that would forbid me were I disposed to qualify my sponsorship with even so mild a disclaimer as reluctance. Have I said more than a loyal friend should? If so, on the other hand, have I not done all that a loyal friend could? I