The "political clause" of the preamble was the subject of extended discussion.[337] At this time all efforts to alter the preamble were unsuccessful. The debate was significant, however, in foreshadowing the much more serious struggle which was to take place a year later when the I. W. W. was literally split in two over the question of the retention or the elimination of the "political clause." Daniel DeLeon was a member of the Committee on Constitution and made a long speech in opposition to the motion to eliminate from the preamble all reference to the "political field," declaring that "the position of the I. W. W. is that when the day [_der Tag_ of the socialists, the day of the Revolution] shall come it shall itself project its own political party."[338] DeLeon was supported in his position by George Speed, who later became a member of the General Executive Board of the so-called anti-political--or Chicago--faction and who has been prominent in the activities of the I. W. W. on the Pacific Coast.[339] Delegate E. J. Foote took the same stand and made a cogent argument for retaining the political clause. [The word] "political" [he said] does have a meaning.... The point is raised that the working class will not have a "government." With that I might agree, but they will have an industrial administration ... and that administration must be political in the sense that it is controlled by the ballot on the inside of your own organization.[340] The constitution committee presented a resolution declaring that "the I. W. W. seeks its political expression only in its own industrial administration." This is vague, and it may have been made designedly so. It might have been brought in to appease those who feared that the I. W. W. would be made the tail to some political party kite.[341] FOOTNOTES: [305] Rudolph Katz, "With DeLeon since '89," _Weekly People_, Nov. 20, 1915, p. 2, col. 1. [306] _Ibid. Cf._ also _infra_, ch. ix. [307] _The I. W. W., History, Structure and Methods_ (1917 ed.), p. 7. [308] November 14, 1907, p. 8, col. 2. [309] The fifteenth convention of the W. F. M. (June, 1907) may be considered as marking its final separation from the I. W. W.; the connection had been only nominal after the Second I. W. W. Convention in October, 1906. As already stated (supra, p. 151) the Federation was formally _suspended_ from the I. W. W. for non-payment of dues, in January, 1907. [310] _Proceedings, Fifteenth Convention, W. F. M._, pp. 232-3. [311] _Industrial Worker_, February, 1907. [312] _Proceedings_, p. 1. [313] _Industrial Workers of the World Bulletin No. 2_, October, 1907. [314] _Ibid._ [315] _Official Report [No. 1], Third I. W. W. Convention_, p. 2, col. 3. [316] Editorial, _Miners' Magazine_, Nov. 14, 1907, p. 8, col. 2. [317] _Ibid._ [318] _Proceedings, Fifteenth Convention, W. F. M._, p. 614. [319] _Ibid._