The I. W. W.: A Study of American SyndicalismBrissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
History
The I. W. W.: A Study of American Syndicalism
Brissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
Industrial Workers of the World; Syndicalism
This, then, is the inspiring task of the I. W. W., and its
purpose and reason of being: To decry the ballot, which is
a civilized method of settling social issues; to advocate
physical force only; to preach petty larceny, rioting,
smashing machines, and all these things that come under
the term "direct action," is unnecessary, and also invites
disaster to the workers and helps the forces of reaction. Such
measures are suicidal and condemned by civilization. For these
reasons the _bona fide_ I. W. W. sets its face like flint
against any organization that teaches such tragedy-producing
tactics. The working class cannot "sabotage," cannot dynamite
itself into possession of the plants of production. Its only
requisite and available _might_ is its sound, class-conscious,
properly-constructed Industrial Union. With such it is
irresistible. By such agency, and by it alone, can it take
permanent possession of the tools of production, and only in
that way can civilization be saved from a catastrophe. As has
been well said, "Right without Might is a fool's pastime; Might
without Right is the sport of the savage."[501]
Eugene Debs, who was one of the leading spirits in the organization
of the I. W. W. in 1905, and who thought that the elimination of
the political clause by the Chicago faction in 1908 was a monstrous
blunder, endorsed the position of the DeLeonites on political action.
"This faction," said Debs, "is corner-stoned in the true principles of
unionism in reference to political action."[502] He thought that there
was "no essential difference between the Chicago and Detroit factions
of the I. W. W." "If I am right in believing that a majority of the
rank and file of the Chicago faction favor political action," he said,
"then there is no reason why this majority should not consolidate
with the Detroit faction, and thus put an end to the division of
these forces."[503] Debs was of the opinion that, if the I. W. W. had
continued as it began, "a revolutionary industrial union, recognizing
the need of political as well as industrial action, instead of being
hamstrung by its own leaders and converted ... into an anti-political
machine, it would today be the most formidable labor organization in
America, if not the world."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account