The I. W. W.: A Study of American SyndicalismBrissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
History
The I. W. W.: A Study of American Syndicalism
Brissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
Industrial Workers of the World; Syndicalism
==================================================================
| | | |
Total strike | No. | Aggregate | No. of | No. of
expenditures. | involved. | duration. | arrests. | convictions.
-----------------+-----------+-----------+----------+-------------
$101,504.05 | 75,152 | 74 weeks. | 1,446 | 577
------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to the beginning of the strike [says the Federal report just
quoted] there was little or no effective organization among
the employees, taken as a whole. A few of the skilled crafts,
composed principally of English-speaking workers, had their own
separate organizations, but the 10 crafts thus organized had at
the time of the strike only approximately 2,500 members. The
Industrial Workers of the World had also some years before this
established an organization in Lawrence. At the beginning of
the strike they claimed a membership of approximately 1,000.
They had at different times names on their rolls in excess
of this number, but it is estimated by active members of the
organization that at the beginning of January, 1912, there
were not more than 300 paid-up members on the rolls of the
Industrial Workers.[563]
This statement of the situation is borne out by Mr. John Golden's
testimony before the House Committee on Rules. He said that when the
strike broke out, "according to the official books of the Industrial
Workers of the World, they had 287 members."[564]
During the period of the strike there were many violent demonstrations
and numerous acts of violence on the part of deputies, police, and
militiamen, as well as on the part of the strikers. Early in the
strike, Joseph J. Ettor and Wm. D. Haywood, both I. W. W. officials,
came to Lawrence and thereafter figured prominently in the conduct
of the strike, preaching "solidarity," "passive resistance," "direct
action," and "sabotage" as means to victory. The daily press reports of
the strike greatly exaggerated the violence of the strikers and almost
uniformly neglected to mention acts of violence on the other side.
In the I. W. W. press the situation was reversed, and the lawlessness
of the constituted authorities greatly overdrawn. A writer who is,
at any rate, not sympathetic with the I. W. W. describes the strike
activities. He says that shortly after five o'clock (a.m., January 29,
1912), when it was still dark, an attack was made upon the street-cars,
during which the trolleys were pulled off the feed-wire, the windows
smashed with chunks of ice, the motormen and conductors driven off,
and the passengers in some cases not allowed to leave the cars, and
in others, pulled from the cars and thrown into the streets.[565] And
while conferences were still going on, according to the same authority,
the leaders of the Industrial Workers of the World
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account