The I. W. W.: A Study of American SyndicalismBrissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
History
The I. W. W.: A Study of American Syndicalism
Brissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
Industrial Workers of the World; Syndicalism
There was great friction between the I. W. W. and the locals of other
labor organizations. The Socialists and I. W. W.s accused the American
Federation of Labor leaders of trying to break the strike. "All the
mechanical crafts," we read in a pro-I. W. W. journal, "including
engineers, firemen, electrical workers, machinists and railroaders ...
remained at work, scabbing on their fellows with the full sanction ...
of their officials."[571] In the face of this antagonism the rank and
file of the A. F. of L. membership contributed liberally to the strike
fund, giving about $11,000 to the cause of the strikers. Socialist
contributions are placed at $40,000 and those of the I. W. W. local
unions at $16,000.[572] The Federal investigators report that "these
relief funds came from all sections of the country and average $1,000 a
day throughout the strike."[573]
The Lawrence strike furnished the opportunity for some parading of the
idea of a general strike. William D. Haywood, in his first speech to
the strikers after his arrival in Lawrence, said: "If we prevail on
other workers who handle your goods to help you out by going on strike,
we will tie up the railroads, put the city in darkness and starve the
soldiers out."[574] This agitation became more vigorous, however, after
the strike itself and during the subsequent trial of the two I. W. W.
agitators, Ettor and Giovannitti.
They were in jail at Salem, Massachusetts, at the time of the seventh
I. W. W. convention in September, 1912, and the General Executive
Board, in its report, threatened that unless these "fellow-workers are
acquitted the industries of this country will feel the power of the
workers expressed in a general tie-up in all industries...."[575]
In addition to the general strike, a boycott was demanded. Under the
caption, "Boycott Lawrence," a heavily headlined announcement was
printed on the front page of the _Industrial Worker_.[576] It ran in
part:
_Boycott Lawrence.... Railroad men: Lose their cars for them!
Telegraphers: Lose their messages for them! Expressmen: Lose
their packages for them! Boycott Lawrence! Boycott it to the
limit!..._
Let nothing, cars, messages, packages, mails or anything
whatsoever that bears the sign, label or address of an official
of the Wool Trust, or of a bank, business house, or prostituted
newspaper, which favors them, or of a judge, policeman or
cossack, or any one who lends the slightest aid to the
mill-owners, go on its way undisturbed!
_Boycott Lawrence!_
Against the bludgeons of _Industrial Despotism_ bring the
silent might of the _Industrial Democracy_!
_Boycott Lawrence!_
The result of the strike was a decided victory for the strikers. The
Federal government's investigators reported that
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account