The I. W. W.: A Study of American SyndicalismBrissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
History
The I. W. W.: A Study of American Syndicalism
Brissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
Industrial Workers of the World; Syndicalism
[700] One of them was the editor of _Direct Action_, an I. W. W. paper
published in Sydney.
[701] _New York Times_, April 14, 1917, p. 6.
[702] _Cf._ letter from the General Secretary of the Australian
Administration, in _Report of General-Secretary-Treasurer_ to the Tenth
I. W. W. Convention (1916), _Proceedings_, pp. 42-43. _Vide_, also,
_New York Times_, Dec. 20, 1916, p. 5, col. 2.
[703] The _Unlawful Associations Act_ (No. 41 of 1916), assented to
Dec. 21, 1916, and amended by the _Unlawful Associations Act_ (No. 14
of 1917), assented to July 27, 1917.
[704] _Christian Science Monitor_, October 4, 1918.
[705] The preamble is printed in full in _The World_ (Oakland,
Cal.), October 18, 1918, p. 3. (Reprinted from the _British Columbia
Federationist_, Sept. 27, 1918, article by W. Francis Ahern, Australian
correspondent.) Mr. Ahern gives a detailed description of the structure
of the new union and shows that in this respect, also, it follows the
American I. W. W. very closely. Other meetings in furtherance of this
project are reported to have been held in the fall of 1918 in Brisbane
and Melbourne. (_Ibid._) This recrudescence of militant industrialism
in Australia appears to be an indirect outcome of the defeat of the
Labor party in the federal election of 1917.
[706] 65th Cong., 2nd sess., S. 4471.
[707] _Ibid._ The bill was amended by the Judiciary committee and
favorably reported to the House.
[708] 65th Cong., 2nd sess., S. 4471. The one hundred odd members
of the I. W. W., who were indicted in 1917, were indicted, tried
and convicted, not under any specific anti-_sabotage_, "criminal
syndicalism" or unlawful associations statute, but under section 4 of
the "Espionage Act" of June 15, 1917, and sections 6, 19 and 37 of the
Criminal Code of the United States. (_The United States of America vs.
William D. Haywood et al._, no. 6125 in the District Court of the U.
S., Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.)
[709] Acts of 1919, ch. 188. Approved May 5, 1919.
[710] Acts of 1917, ch. 145. Approved Mar. 14, 1917.
[711] Act no. 139.
[712] Acts of 1917, ch. 215. Approved Apr. 13, 1917.
[713] Approved Jan. 30, 1918.
[714] Acts of 1918, ch. 7. Approved Feb. 21, 1918.
[715] Special Session, 15th legislative assembly (1918), Senate bill
no. 12. Approved Mar. 23, 1918.
[716] Laws and resolutions passed at the 36th (extraordinary) session
of the legislature (1918), ch. 9. Approved Apr. 9, 1918.
[717] On January 14, 1919, the Washington Syndicalism bill was passed
over the Governor's veto. Session laws of 1919, ch. 3. [S. B. 264,
Session of 1917].
[718] In the case of State _vs._ Moilen, 167 N. W. 345.
[719] A digest of the court's opinion is given in the _Monthly Labor
Review_ (U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics), vol. vii, pp. 177-179
(July, 1918).
[720] _Cf._ Caroline Nelson on "The Constructive Side of the New
Unionism," in her pamphlet, _Aggressive Unionism_, pp. 20-24.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account