The improved antidote, supposed to be more active in expelling poison, than a late invention, by the Rev. Sir Harcourt Lees, Bart. in which the Catholics are vindicated from his abuse, and their claims for unrestricted emancipation, consideredPhilodemus
Religion
The improved antidote, supposed to be more active in expelling poison, than a late invention, by the Rev. Sir Harcourt Lees, Bart. in which the Catholics are vindicated from his abuse, and their claims for unrestricted emancipation, considered
The Church of Rome exceeded all other Hierarchies in extent of
Dominion, of Power, and of Influence; its exertions, therefore, against
all assailants would be proportionably vigorous, its persecutions
proportionably extensive:—these assertions are not advanced with the
view of vindicating Persecution, they are meant merely to account,
in some measure, for its origin;—convinced that the God of Mercy can
delight only in Virtue and Integrity, every reflecting mind must abhor
and condemn the mistaken zeal of those, who think they promote the
service of the Divinity, by torturing and afflicting his creatures:—but
have the members of the Protestant Establishment entirely abstained
from the exercise of this instrument, to establish or confirm their
Power? Are they, altogether, innocent of resorting to this object of
their reprehension? For a solution of these questions we may recur to
our own domestic annals. Has not the bulk of the Irish Nation been
subject to the will and caprice of a few individuals (in comparison
with its population) and this, for adhering to the religion of their
forefathers?—Have not the ministers of this religion (after being
compelled to seek their education in some foreign country) been
debarred from the exercise of their sacred functions except by stealth
or privacy?—Have not the adherents to this Religion been shackled in
every effort to better their condition?—Have they not been rendered
incapable of acquiring real property?—If possessed of such property,
have they not been subject to its entire forfeiture by information or
discovery?—Were not such forfeitures intended to act as allurements
for children to inform, even, against their own parents?—Was not every
father of a family liable to punishment for educating his children, in
that religious persuasion, which he esteemed the only true one?—Were not
Catholics ineligible to any office of power or trust?—Were not these Acts
in force for nearly a century?—Many other grievances, equally oppressive
in addition to these, were inflicted on them in direct violation of the
Treaty of Limerick, in which it was stipulated, that the Irish should
be admissible to all the Privileges of subjects, upon taking the oath
of Allegiance, without being bound to take the oath of Supremacy:—our
domestic annals, then, afford a strong presumption that the Protestant
Establishment has been no less culpable, in the exercise of persecution,
as an instrument to support its power, than the Romish Hierarchy so much
inveighed against; whilst its present conduct, in still withholding
from the Catholics a full participation in the privileges to which its
Protestant Subjects are admitted, is a convincing proof that it continues
actuated by a spirit of intolerance;—not to particularize the absurd
calumnies, the foul misrepresentations, so vehemently urged against
them, and of which some of its ministers (we regret to observe) are
too intemperate in the application;—strange inconsistency that there
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account