The improved antidote, supposed to be more active in expelling poison, than a late invention, by the Rev. Sir Harcourt Lees, Bart. in which the Catholics are vindicated from his abuse, and their claims for unrestricted emancipation, consideredPhilodemus
Religion
The improved antidote, supposed to be more active in expelling poison, than a late invention, by the Rev. Sir Harcourt Lees, Bart. in which the Catholics are vindicated from his abuse, and their claims for unrestricted emancipation, considered
National reflections, it has been observed, are not justified in theory,
nor on any general principles;—the same observation will hold good
in regard to Sects, Parties, or Professions:—particular individuals
may, undoubtedly, be just objects of censure, particular tenets of
reprehension, but indiscriminate abuse, is the offspring of prejudice
or malevolence, it can never derive its origin from sober reason and
impartiality.—To follow the author of the Antidote through his abusive
rhapsody against the Schismatics, would, perhaps, engage us too far in
scurrility, to examine into the tenets, he attributes to them, will,
at least, more usefully employ our attention. A new sect has been
lately formed, the constitution of whose church, he says, instructs its
adherents that, through belief, they will escape from the guilt and
punishment of sin; this proposition, advanced as one of the tenets of
the new sect, is scarcely intelligible;—that a due portion of belief
will exonerate us from the punishment of sin, may be readily understood,
however we may doubt of its truth, but that the commission of sin will
not involve us in guilt, is a proposition that cannot without difficulty
be comprehended. The Revd. Author may mean perhaps, that they maintain
faith to be more meritorious than good works, a doctrine which has been
ascribed to many of the sectaries, but, as it is not included by him
who founded our Religion, among the immediate requisites for salvation,
it ought to be examined with the utmost caution, and, if upon such an
examination, it should appear disadvantageous to the interest of society,
it ought at once to be rejected—according to this tenet, its adherents
are not required to cultivate those good qualities, which are beneficial
to mankind; they neglect the occasions of beneficence, they lose even
the dispositions of benevolence, in cultivating faith, which quality
above all others, will insure their acceptance with God. They expose
themselves to the frauds of knaves, or the errors of fanatics, into which
frauds and errors however, they dare not examine, as to doubt, is to fail
in that essential point, on which they found their future hope;—under the
influence likewise of this principle, the tenor of their conduct becomes
a matter of no moment, it induces negligence in regard to their duties,
as men in a state of society, since active virtue can be of no avail,
where faith is esteemed the sole requisite for justification:—a less
grave argument also, though upon so serious a subject, may, perhaps, be
not inapplicable. Faith depends upon ignorance, of course the less a man
knows, the more he has to believe, hence the most ignorant, with a due
supply of credulity, will become the most meritorious of christians:—we
would moreover, recommend it to the Revd. Author, of the Antidote, to
examine more accurately into his own Articles of Belief, as required by
law, before he censures this doctrine of the Sectaries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account