The Indians of the Pike's Peak Region: Including an Account of the Battle of Sand Creek, and of Occurrences in El Paso County, Colorado, during the War with the Cheyennes and Arapahoes, in 1864 and 1868Howbert, Irving
History
The Indians of the Pike's Peak Region: Including an Account of the Battle of Sand Creek, and of Occurrences in El Paso County, Colorado, during the War with the Cheyennes and Arapahoes, in 1864 and 1868
Howbert, Irving
El Paso County, Colo. -- History; Indians of North America -- Colorado; Sand Creek Massacre, Colo., 1864
It was under these circumstances of trial, suffering, and
danger on the part of the people, and of fruitless appeal
upon my part to the general government for aid, that I issued
my proclamation of the 11th of August, 1864, of which the
committee complains.
Without means to mount or pay militia, and failing to get
government authority to raise forces, and under the withdrawal
of the few troops in the Territory, could any other course be
pursued?
The people were asked to fight on their own account—at their
own expense—and in lieu of the protection the government
failed to render. They were authorized to kill only the Indians
that were murdering and robbing them in hostility, and to
keep the property captured from them. How the committee would
have them fight these savages, and what other disposition
they would make of the property captured, the public will be
curious to know. Would they fight without killing? Would they
have the captured property turned over to the government, as
if captured by United States troops? Would they forbid such
captures? Would they restore it to the hostile tribes?
The absurdity of the committee's saying that this was an
"appeal to the cupidity," is too palpable to require much
comment. Would men leave high wages, mount and equip themselves
at enormous expense, as some patriotically did, for the poor
chance of capturing property, as a mere speculation, from the
prowling bands of Indians that infested the settlements and
were murdering their families? The thing is preposterous.
For this proclamation I have no apology. It had its origin
and has its justification in the imperative necessities of the
case. A merciless foe surrounded us. Without means to mount or
pay militia, unable to secure government authority to raise
forces, and our own troops ordered away, again I ask, could
any other course be pursued?
Captain Tyler's and other companies organized under it, at
enormous expense, left their lucrative business, high wages,
and profitable employment, and served without other pay than
the consciousness of having done noble and patriotic service;
and no act of impropriety has ever been laid to the charge
of any party acting under this proclamation. They had all
been disbanded months before the "attack" was made that the
committee were investigating.
The third regiment was organized under authority from the War
Department, subsequently received by telegraph, and under a
subsequent proclamation issued on the 13th of August, and were
regularly mustered into the service of the United States about
three months before the battle the committee were investigating
occurred.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account