The Industrial History of EnglandGibbins, Henry de Beltgens
History
The Industrial History of England
Gibbins, Henry de Beltgens
Great Britain -- Economic conditions; Industries -- Great Britain -- History
§ 12. THE KINDS OF LAND IN A MANOR—Before concluding this chapter, it
is necessary, in order to complete our {20} sketch of the manorial
system from the time of the Conquest onwards, to understand how the
land was divided up. We may say that there were seven kinds of land
altogether, (1) First came the lord’s land round about the manor-house,
the _demesne_ land, which was strictly his own, and generally
cultivated by himself or his bailiff. All other land held by tenants
was called _land in villeinage_. (2) Next came the arable land of
the village held by the tenants in _common fields_. Now these fields
were all divided up into many strips, and tenants held their strips
generally in quite different places, all mixed up anyhow (cf. diagram,
where the tenants are marked A, B. C, etc.). The lord and the parson
might also have a few strips in these fields. There were at least
three fields, in order to allow the rotation of crops mentioned before
(p. 8). Each tenant held his strip only till harvest, after which all
fences and divisions were taken away, and the cattle turned out to feed
on the stubble. (3) Thirdly came the _common pasture_, for all the
tenants. But each tenant was restricted or stinted in the number of
cattle that he might pasture, lest he should put on too many, and thus
not leave enough food for his neighbours’ cattle. Sometimes, however,
we find pasture without stint, as in Port Meadow at Oxford to this day.
(4) Then comes the _forest_ or _woodland_, as in Estone, which belonged
to the lord, who owned all the timber. But the tenants had rights, such
as the right of lopping and topping certain trees, collecting fallen
branches for fuel; and the right of “pannage”—_i.e._ of turning cattle,
especially swine, into the woods to pick up what food they could.
(5) There was also in most manors what is called the _waste_—_i.e._
uncultivated—land, affording rough pasture, and on which the tenants
had the right of cutting turf and bracken for fuel and fodder. Then
near the stream there would {21}
DIAGRAM OF A MANOR
THE KING (supreme landlord)
│
TENANT IN CHIEF, owning various manors.
│
A SUB-TENANT, or tenant in mesne, the lord of the
manor below.
│
[Illustration]
{22}
perhaps be some (6) _Meadow land_, as at Cuxham; but this always
belonged to the lord, and if he let it out, he always charged an extra
rent (say eightpence instead of sixpence an acre), for it was very
valuable as affording a good supply of hay for the winter. Lastly, if
the tenant could afford it, and wanted to have other land besides the
common fields, where he could let his cattle lie, or to cultivate the
ground more carefully, he could occupy (7) a _close_, or a portion of
land specially marked off and let separately. The lord always had a
close on his demesne, and the chief tenants would generally have one or
two as well. The close land was of course rented more highly than land
in the common fields.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account