The Industrial History of EnglandGibbins, Henry de Beltgens
History
The Industrial History of England
Gibbins, Henry de Beltgens
Great Britain -- Economic conditions; Industries -- Great Britain -- History
§ 4. ENGLISH MANUFACTURES—Now, although I have spoken of Flanders as
the manufacturing centre for Europe, it must not be supposed that
England could not manufacture any of the large quantity of wool which
it grew. Undoubtedly the people of the Netherlands were at that time
the great manufacturers of the world, and were acquainted with arts
and processes to which the English were strangers, while for a long
time the English could not weave fine cloths; but, nevertheless,
there was a considerable manufacturing industry, chiefly of coarse
cloths, an industry very widely spread, and carried on in people’s own
cottages under the domestic system. The chief kinds of cloth made were
hempen, linen, and woollen coverings, such as would be used for sacks,
dairy-cloths, woolpacks, sails of windmills, and similar purposes.
The great textile centres were Norfolk and Suffolk, where, indeed,
manufacturing industries had existed long before the earliest records.
An idea of their importance may be given from the fact that, in the
assessment for the wool-tax of 1341, Norfolk was counted by far the
wealthiest county in England after Middlesex (including London). {52}
There was also a cloth industry of importance in the West of England,
the chief centres being Westbury, Sherborne, and Salisbury. The linen
of Aylsham was also celebrated.
§ 5. FOREIGN MANUFACTURE OF FINE GOODS—But we find rich people used to
purchase fine cloths from abroad—_e.g._ linen from Liège and Flanders
generally, and velvet and silk goods from Genoa and Venice—although
there was certainly a silk industry in London, carried on chiefly by
women, and protected by an Act of 1454. In the England of which we are
now speaking, the textile industries were prevented from attaining a
full development from the fact that, though general, they were strictly
local; and, moreover, those who practised them did not look upon
their handicraft as their sole means of livelihood, but even till the
eighteenth century were generally engaged in agriculture as well. The
cause of this is connected with the isolation and self-sufficiency of
separate communities, previously noted. An evidence of the consequent
inferiority of English to Flemish cloth is given by the fact that an
Act of 1261 attempts to prohibit the import of spun stuff and the
export of wool. Needless to say it was useless. The prices of cloth
at this period are interesting, as showing the great difference
between the fine (_i.e._ foreign) and coarse (home) cloths. The
average price of linen is 4_d._ an ell, being as low as 2_d._ and as
high as 8¼_d._ Inferior woollens sold at 1_s._ 7½_d._ a
yard, “russet” at 1_s._ 4_d._, blanketing at 1_s._ On the other hand,
scarlet cloth (foreign) rises to the enormous price of 15_s._ a yard.
Cloth for liveries varied from 2_s._ 1_d._ to 1_s._ per yard. Speaking
generally for the period 1260–1400, we may give the average price of
the best quality at 3_s._ 3½_d._ a yard from 1260–1350, and 3_s._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account