The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
When war broke out with England, lasting from 1624 to 1630, of course
the treaty of 1604-5 became dormant, but it was not until April 22,
1626, that a royal proclamation of non-intercourse with England
appeared, confiscating all English goods imported in contravention of
it, and this was followed, May 29th, by a _carta acordada_ of the
Suprema ordering the prosecution, in the regular way, of all Englishmen
who had been delinquent as regards the faith.[335] This led to a
discussion between the three inquisitors. Francisco de Santalis
presented a long opinion to the effect that in Tenerife there were very
many of them who, in spite of the war, remained, in place of departing
as enemies. The orders of the Suprema were therefore applicable to them;
Catholics incurred the risk of excommunication in supplying them with
food and were exposed to the danger of infection; they were delinquents
in not hearing mass or confessing and communing, and in eating meat on
fast days. This was not only a great scandal, but it afforded
opportunity of flight and of concealing their property, which was
large. He therefore voted that secret information be taken as to their
delinquencies and, when this was sufficient, that they should all be
arrested and their property be sequestrated, after which the orders of
the Suprema could be awaited as to their prosecution. The other two
inquisitors, Alonso Rincon and Gabriel Martínez, referred to a
consultation had on September 2d with the Ordinary, the consultors, and
the calificadores, when it was resolved that the matter be referred to
the Suprema and no action be taken till its orders were received; the
royal proclamation had said nothing about residents; to seize them and
their property would be a great hardship; the commissioners at La
Laguna, Orotava and Garachico had been instructed to be vigilant and no
denunciations had been received. It is creditable to the tribunal that
it resisted the temptation of seizing the large amount of property
involved, and the English appear not to have been molested.[336]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account