The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
promise to send the fiscal with all the documents by the next vessel,
for the authority and power of the Inquisition depend upon the
result.[360]
While this was pending a quarrel arose between the tribunal and the
chapter, because the latter refused to pay to the fiscal the fruits of
his prebend. Inquisitor-general Arce y Reynoso ordered the chapter to
make the payment, which led the canon Matheo de Cassares and the
racionero Cristóbal Vandama to commit certain acts of disrespect. To
punish this the inquisitors, on November 16, 1655, arrested them, in
conformity with the rules prescribed by the Suprema, in its letter of
September 6, 1644, respecting the arrest of prebendaries, but, at the
prayer of the chapter, they were released on the third day. They were
friends of Bishop Gutiérrez, who nursed his wrath until December 26th,
when there was a solemn celebration in the cathedral, at which
Inquisitor Frias celebrated mass. When Inquisitor Badaran entered and
took his seat in the choir, Gutiérrez in a loud voice commanded him to
leave the church, as he was under excommunication for arresting clerics
without jurisdiction. To avoid creating a tumult he did so; Frias
celebrated mass and then joined him in the tribunal, where they drew up
the necessary papers. The affair of course created an immense scandal
and led to prolonged correspondence with the Suprema, which ordered it
suspended April 12, 1657.[361] They were not much more successful in the
outcome of the previous quarrel, although they succeeded, at the end of
1656, in procuring a royal order summoning Gutiérrez to the court. In
communicating this to the bishop, December 13, 1656, the Licenciate Blas
Canales advises him, if he has any money to spare, to invest it in a
jewel for presentation to the king, through the hands of the minister
Louis de Haro. He probably followed the judicious counsel, for the
matter ended with a decree relieving him from the fine imposed on him by
the inquisitors.[362]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account