The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
There was one case, however, in which the tribunal and the Archbishop of
Mexico combined for the persecution of a bishop, for Juan de Mañozca,
the archbishop from 1643 to 1653, was cousin of the inquisitor of the
same name. The saintly Bishop Juan de Palafox of Puebla, in his capacity
of visitador and protector of the Indians, incurred the enmity of the
archbishop and of the Viceroy Salvatierra, and an occasion of gratifying
it occurred when he undertook to guard his episcopal jurisdiction
against the encroachments of the Jesuits. They appointed _jueces
conservadores_ to protect their interests and the tribunal rushed
eagerly into the fray, with which it had absolutely no right to
intervene.[503] It ordered the suppression of the writings and edicts of
Palafox and forbade any interference with those of the conservators; it
sent a commissioner to Puebla who terrorized the community by arresting
prominent priests and citizens of the bishop’s party, parading them
through the streets in chains and sending them to Mexico, where they
were thrown into the secret prison, thus inflicting indelible disgrace
on them and their posterity. In spite of the exemption of Indians from
inquisitorial jurisdiction, he flogged nearly to death, with four
hundred lashes, an unfortunate Indian who, at the command of a citizen,
had taken down one of the conservators’ edicts. Palafox was advised that
he too would be arrested and fled to the mountains, where he lay
concealed for several months.[504] When, in 1647, he appealed to the
Suprema, powers were sent to the Bishop of Oaxaca to investigate and
report, but Archbishop Mañozca threw every impediment in his way and, in
his capacity of visitador of the Inquisition, assumed to annul his
commission. He appealed to the Bishop of Yucatan, then Governor of New
Spain, and to the Audiencia for support, but the archbishop threatened
to excommunicate them all and they prudently declined the conflict.
Palafox represents to the Suprema that his life was in danger and he
begs to be allowed to return to Spain.[505] The combination of the
archbishopric and Inquisition, under the two Mañozcas, evidently held
the whole land in its grasp, and no one was hardy enough to oppose it.
Palafox was obliged to abandon Mexico, but he eventually secured a
decision in his favor on an appeal to Rome.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account