The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
An episode of this case is worth recounting in some detail, not only as
illustrating inquisitorial methods but as a rare instance of a victim
obtaining a measure of satisfaction. Doctor Juan de la Camara, a canon
of the cathedral, was a man of noble birth, proud of his unblemished
_limpieza_, and his appointment as visitador of the see of Guadalajara
indicates the estimation in which he was held by his superiors.
Unfortunately he was a friend and correspondent of Palafox. When, in
1646, a bitter libel was circulated against the latter, one of the
judges of the Audiencia, Alonso González de Villalba, was included in
it. Palafox endured the attack in silence and endeavored to make
Villalba follow his example, but the latter was so incensed that he
wrote a reply in which he handled roughly the inquisitor Mañozca. He
showed it to his neighbor Camara, who returned it without comment and
said nothing about it except to Don Antonio Urrutía de Vergara, to whom
he mentioned it in order that he might tell the archbishop, and to a
Doña Catalina de Diosdado, to whom he merely said that he had seen two
scandalous papers and that, if the author confessed to him, he would not
absolve him.
There was a chance that among his papers something might be found to
compromise Palafox, so an order of arrest with sequestration of property
was made out, February 7, 1647. At eight o’clock in the morning Camara
was roused from his bed and taken in his own carriage to the secret
prison, where he was confined in a cell of which the window had been
blocked up, so that the single candle to which he was restricted was his
only light by day and night. Here he was kept _incomunicado_ for twenty
days. After the tenth day, however, on which he was examined, the
obstructions were removed from the window and, after the twentieth, his
brother, Fray Diego, and some other friends were permitted to see him on
obtaining a special licence for each visit. Meanwhile his papers had
been carried off to the tribunal, without being inventoried as required
by the Instructions; on the day after his arrest his household effects
were inventoried and placed in the hands of the receiver, Juan González
de Castro, as depository, but they were not removed from the house and
no care was taken to ensure their safety.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account