The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
At nightfall of March 15th he was taken back to his house and told that
it was henceforth to be his prison, under pain of excommunication and a
thousand ducats. On April 1st his prison was enlarged to the city, under
the same penalties, and he was enabled to resume his duties at the
cathedral. Of course the immurement in the secret prison, with
sequestration of property, of so prominent an ecclesiastic, caused a
general sensation; it was at the height of the prosecution of the
Judaizers and the inevitable conclusion was that they had implicated
him, so that a stain was cast upon his honor which no subsequent
exculpation could wholly efface. His papers were withheld from him; his
house had been richly furnished, with abundance of silver plate and
linen, much of which had disappeared, and he seems to have deplored
especially the loss of eighteen ounces of amber. His trial remained
unconcluded and his repeated applications for a decision and for the
restoration of missing property were filed away without action. His only
hope of escape from prolonged and intolerable suspense lay in appealing
to the Suprema. The inquisitors had already sought to prejudice it
against him for, in a letter of May 20th, they spoke of the incredible
efforts and diabolical means employed to intimidate them from the
performance of their duty in the matter of Palafox; Camara was an
accomplice of Villalba in publishing the libel; he had perjured himself
in his confessions and might be assumed to be the author of the worst
passages in it. In spite of this the Suprema, by a decree of September
28, 1647, ordered his release, on the security of his oath, and the
sequestration of his property to be removed.
Camara succeeded in secretly obtaining from the king an order, November
16, 1647, permitting him to go to Spain, but he was impoverished and
sent his brother, Fray Diego, to act for him. The mission occupied Diego
for several years, but he finally procured from the Suprema a commission
to the Inquisitor Higuera to try the case promptly for, during all this
time, it had been held suspended over Camara’s head. This was presented,
February 15, 1650, and, on the following July 12th, Higuera, who was at
odds with Mañozca, rendered a sentence acquitting him and restoring him
to his previous good fame, so that his arrest should work no prejudice
to him or to his kindred and their descendants; also that the chapter
should pay him all the accrued fruits of his prebend and that his papers
and property should be returned to him. From this Camara appealed to the
Suprema, which confirmed it, July 7, 1651; then the fiscal of the
Suprema appealed and it was again confirmed, July 31st. The whole
prosecution was thus stamped as being malicious and groundless, but
nevertheless Camara in vain endeavored to regain possession of his
papers and of his missing effects.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account