The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
The edict is a singular medley of politics and religion, illustrating
the dual character of the Inquisition of the period and the enormous
advantage to the Government of possessing control over the
ecclesiastical establishment, whereby an attack on the civil power could
be made to assume the appearance of an assault on the faith. All the
heretical utterances, discredited nine years before by the action of the
tribunal, are put forward as absolute facts. It is impiety that has led
him to raise the standard of revolt and to seduce numbers of unhappy
dupes to follow him. In the inability to reach him personally, he is
summoned, under pain of excommunication, to appear for trial within
thirty days, in default of which he will be prosecuted _in rebeldía_ to
definitive sentence and burning in effigy if necessary. All who support
him or have converse with him and all those who do not denounce those
who favor his revolutionary projects are declared guilty of the crime of
fautorship of heresy and subject to the penalties decreed for it by the
canons. When to this are added the proclamations of excommunication
issued against the insurgents by the Archbishop of Mexico and the
bishops of the disturbed districts, it will be seen how powerful was the
restraining influence exercised by the Church over a population trained
to submission, and how intense were the passions that braved its
anathema.[537]
In fact, the hatred of the creoles and the Indians for the _Gachupines_,
or Spaniards, was so bitter that four-fifths of the native clergy
espoused the cause of the insurgents, in spite of the censures of the
Church, and questions of faith became inextricably involved in the
contest between the factions. To the loyalists, Hidalgo became a heretic
or indeed a heresiarch, and the confessional was so largely used by them
that the insurgents became guilty of a new heresy, by asserting that
confession to a Gachupin priest was invalid. They found great comfort,
moreover, through their belief in the protection of Our Lady of
Guadalupe, who was universally revered, and especially by the Indians,
as the sovereign patroness of Mexico. On the fateful 16th of September,
when Hidalgo was marching on San Miguel el Grande at the head of his
little band of insurgents, in passing through Atolonila, he chanced to
take an image on linen of the Guadalupe Virgin and give it to one of his
men to carry as a banner. It was adopted by the other bands as they rose
and it became the standard of the insurrection, usually accompanied with
an image of Fernando VII and of the eagle of Mexico, and the inscription
“_Viva nuestra Señora de Guadalupe! Viva Fernando VII! Viva la America y
muere el mal gobierno!_” Second in rank as a tutelary power of the
insurrection was Our Lady of Puebla and against these the loyalists
pitted a new-comer, Our Lady of los Remedios, who was denounced as a
Gachupina by the natives. There is a subject of study for the student of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account