The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
of their import, he was a formal heretic. This was practically the last
act of the long drawn-out comedy, although some additional testimony
concerning Hidalgo was taken and recorded, February 10 and 20, 1812, in
the trial of the habitual liar, Fray Manuel Estrada. Events had moved
faster than the Inquisition. After the disastrous day of the Bridge of
Calderon, Hidalgo in his flight had been captured, March 21, 1811, at
Bajan, and carried two hundred leagues farther north to Chihuahua, where
he was executed, July 31st, before the calificadores had finished their
formulation of his heresies. No notice of this was given to the
Inquisition, which was treated with a singular discourtesy, savoring of
contempt. The explanation of this probably is that, if it had been
apprised of the capture, it could rightly have claimed the prisoner as a
heretic, primarily subject to its supreme and exclusive jurisdiction;
there might have been danger in escorting him back through the recently
disturbed provinces; the processes of the Inquisition were notoriously
slow and, after it had tried the culprit and he had abjured and been
penanced in an auto de fe, he would still have to be condemned in a
military court. It was in every way wiser to try him and despatch him in
far-off Chihuahua, and the local military and ecclesiastical authorities
coöperated to this result, leaving the Inquisition to find out what it
could, and not even forwarding a supplication which Hidalgo addressed to
it, on June 10th.
The tribunal waited patiently for eleven months after the catastrophe
and then, on June 25, 1812, it wrote, with much solemnity, to its two
commissioners in Chihuahua, reminding them that the edict of October 13,
1810, rendered it their duty to keep it advised of the capture of
Hidalgo and of all subsequent occurrences. They should have gone to him
in prison and exhorted him to make a declaration on all points contained
in the edict and whatever else weighed upon his conscience. All signs of
repentance should have been observed and reported, and at least his
confession to his judges, in so far as the Inquisition was concerned,
should have been sent to it. The alcaide, the ecclesiastics and the
military officers must now be examined as to his state of mind during
his imprisonment, so that the tribunal may be informed as to his
repentance or impenitence and thus be enabled to render justice. The two
commissioners are to work in harmony, with power of subdelegation, and
they are made responsible, before God and the king, for the due
discharge of their duties.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account