The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
It was somewhat brutal to have kept the tribunal so long in the dark on
a matter touching its highest privilege and to have detained for sixteen
months, on a frivolous pretext, a supplication addressed directly to it,
but its position was becoming precarious and it dared not complain.
Napoleon’s suppression of the Inquisition of Spain, in 1808, did not
count for much, but the Córtes of Cádiz had enacted a liberal
Constitution in 1812 and simultaneously the preliminary skirmishing for
the abrogation of the Inquisition preoccupied all minds. It was enacted
February 22, 1813, and, though the news had not as yet reached Mexico,
the result could scarce have been doubted when the tribunal took action
on March 13th. It evidently placed no faith in the story of a papal
inquisitor, suddenly created in the wilds of Chihuahua, for it wholly
ignored his action. The fiscal reported to the tribunal that, in spite
of Hidalgo’s supplication for pardon and endeavors to satisfy the
charges against him, there were not merits enough to absolve his memory
and fame nor, at the same time, to condemn him, as it appeared that he
had made a general confession and had been reconciled, whereupon the
tribunal ordered the case to be suspended and the papers to be filed in
their proper place--an expression of dissatisfaction and an admission of
powerlessness. On March 29th it acknowledged Salcedo’s letter and drily
thanked him.
Hidalgo’s supplication to the Inquisition, written in his prison on June
10, 1811, is a long and dignified declaration of submission, calmly and
clearly reasoned and manifesting full command of his theological
learning. But for his confinement, he said, he would hasten to throw
himself at the feet of the tribunal, not only to seek pardon for his
insubordination, but to vindicate himself from the charge of heresy and
apostasy, which was insufferable to him. He answered the various
accusations of the edict, denying that he had led an immoral life and
exculpating himself with much dexterity from the heresies imputed to
him, but if, he added, the Inquisition deemed his utterances heretical,
although he had not hitherto so considered them, he now retracted,
abjured and detested them. He concluded by begging to be relieved from
the disgrace of heresy and apostasy; the tribunal could repose entire
faith in his statements for, if he had committed those crimes, the
circumstances in which he now found himself would impel him to confess
them freely, in order to gain the pardon and absolution that would open
to him the gates of heaven and would close them, if withheld, in
consequence of his denial.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account