The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
It was not until December 23d that Viceroy Calleja notified him to
re-establish the tribunal, in execution of the royal decree of July
21st; this he followed on January 4, 1815, with a proclamation embodying
the decree and announcing that the tribunal had been restored to its
jurisdiction and that its property had been returned to it. The
archbishop also issued a pastoral requiring all denunciations to be made
to it and Flores, on January 21st, published an Edict of Faith ordering
the denunciation, within six days, of all heresies, prohibited books and
all words of disrespect towards the Holy Office that might subsequently
be uttered.[544] The tribunal however, was in a sadly dilapidated
condition. The alcaide in a letter of December 30, 1814, reports that
the restoration of property consisted in the written securities and the
real estate, but only 773 pesos of the money had been returned. Notice
had been given that the fruits of the canonries and interest on the
censos were to be paid as formerly to the tribunal. The purchaser of the
furniture, which had been sold at auction in July, was nominally a
merchant but in reality the Count of la Cortina, from whom they were
endeavoring to get it back at the price which it had brought, but much
had been resold; the building had to be refitted for their use and
altogether they were in great distress.[545] To add to their troubles,
the tribunal was so thoroughly discredited that its jurisdiction was
invaded on all sides in a manner indicating the contempt in which it was
held. Viceroy Calleja issued a proclamation condemning to the flames the
Constitution adopted by the insurgents October 22, 1814, at Apatzingan,
together with various of their sermons, addresses, etc., and ordering
them to be denounced to him under pain of death. Then, on May 24, 1815,
he sent a copy of this to the tribunal, inviting it to take action and
use all rigor for their suppression. This provoked the liveliest
resentment of Flores who complained bitterly to the Suprema, June 29th,
of the intrusion on his jurisdiction and of the discourtesy manifested
in not previously submitting to him the offending papers. He also
enlarged on the harshness with which the decree of suppression had been
enforced in 1813 and of the imperfect restitution of property which
Calleja had publicly asserted to have been made. He had also endeavored
to compel the officials to render military service, but this had been
successfully resisted. In spite of all this indignation, however, the
insurgent documents were duly censured by the calificadores and, on July
9th, Flores issued an edict condemning them and specifying their errors.
The chapter of the cathedral (_sede vacante_) had also on May 26th
published an edict requiring the surrender of these documents to it
under pain of excommunication and threatening all priests and
beneficiaries who should not exert themselves against the rebels. This
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account