The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
On August 31st the archbishop reported to the Government that the decree
of suppression had been read in the cathedral on the three Sundays
following its receipt. The sanbenitos were at once removed from the
places where they were hung; the Prior of the Hospital of San José asked
for them to clothe the insane, but the viceroy took them for the troops.
The Archbishop requested to have the prohibited books, which were stored
in four rooms of his palace, and they were given to him. He was an old
inquisitor and lost no time in assuming the jurisdiction over heresy
restored to the episcopate by the decree of suppression. As early as
June 10th, he issued a pastoral ordering denunciation to him of all
persons suspect of heresy and, on September 27th, he published another
calling for the surrender of all prohibited books by those who did not
hold licences.[541]
The decree of suppression provided for the continued salaries of the
officials and after this the two senior inquisitors disappear--Bernardo
de Prado y Obejero and Isidoro Sainz de Alfaro y Beaumont--probably
returning to Spain, where refugees from the American tribunals were
taken care of. The junior, Manuel de Flores, remained and was ready to
resume his functions whenever the “suspension,” as he called it, was
removed. His foresight was speedily rewarded, for one of the first acts
of Fernando VII on his restoration was the decree of May 4, 1814,
abrogating the Constitution of Cádiz, declaring invalid all laws enacted
under it and even menacing with the death-penalty all who should keep
copies of them. This of itself virtually revived the Inquisition, but
legislation was required to reorganize it and this was effected by a
decree of July 21.[542] Inquisitor Flores had not waited for this, as we
find that he had already for some time been gathering evidence against
Manuel Abad y Queipo, Bishop-elect of Mechoacan, which he transmitted,
August 31st, to the Suprema for its action.[543]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account