The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
Cerezuela’s zeal was also rebuked when he represented that foreigners
who came to Peru usually sought at once to penetrate into the interior,
wherefore he proposed that the commissioners at Cartagena and Panamá
should turn them back and not permit them to enter, but the Suprema
replied that their entrance was not to be impeded nor were they to be
prosecuted unless they committed offences coming within the jurisdiction
of the Holy Office, or were detected in bringing prohibited books. At
the same time it ordered a careful inquest as to all strangers scattered
through the land and, when this should be verified with due secrecy, the
commissioners were to be instructed to admit to reconciliation those
found transgressing and, if they refused conversion, they were to be
prosecuted with the full severity of the canons.[598] If the tribunal
thus was prevented from regulating ingress, it assumed full control over
egress, for in June, 1584, it issued a proclamation that no one should
leave the kingdom without its licence, under pain of excommunication and
fines, and shipmasters were ordered to take no passengers without it--an
assumption of power which won the approbation of the Suprema, with the
suggestive warning that the licences must be issued without charge. This
arbitrary exercise of authority was even extended to prohibiting any
vessel from leaving port without a licence, and the abuse became so
intolerable that, as we have seen (Mexico, p. 252), its removal formed
part of the Concordia of 1610. The tribunal chafed under this and, when
it was busy in arresting nearly all the Portuguese merchants in 1636, it
complained to the Suprema that its hands had been tied; to prevent the
escape of those who might be guilty it had applied to the Viceroy
Chinchon who, as a governmental act, ordered that for a year no one
should be given passage without a licence from the Inquisition; he would
willingly have done more, but he had to pay some regard to the
Concordia. The Suprema was impressively asked to see that this matter
should be corrected, as otherwise the faith and the fisc would suffer.
It was probably on this occasion that occurred a detention of the fleet
when ready to sail, to which I have met with an allusion, because
licences had not been procured for the passengers.[599]
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account