The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
The popular repugnance was wholly directed to the Spanish Inquisition
and there was no objection to the papal institution, which had long been
a matter accepted. In 1505 a letter of Gonsalvo directs the arrest in
Manfredonia of three fugitives from Benevento, who are seeking to escape
to Turkey; he does this, he says, at the request of the inquisitor and
of the Bishop of Bertinoro papal commissioner.[113] Evidently there must
have been active persecution on foot in Benevento and, though the
inquisitor is not named, he was probably the Dominican Barnaba
Capograsso, whom we find, in 1506, styled “generale inquisitore de la
fede” when, in conjunction with the vicar-general of the archbishop and
the judges of the vicariate, he burned three women for witchcraft.[114]
Yet anxious as was Ferdinand for the extirpation of heresy, he would not
abate a jot of the royal supremacy and would allow no one to exercise
inquisitorial functions without his licence. The correspondence of the
Count of Ribagorza, who succeeded Gonsalvo as lieutenant-general and
viceroy during the years 1507, 1508, and 1509, shows that Fra Barnaba
held a commission directly from the king. When a certain Fra Vincenzo da
Fernandina endeavored in Barletta to conduct an inquisition, Ribagorza
expressed surprise at his audacity in doing so without exhibiting his
commission; he was summoned to come forthwith and submit it so that due
action could be taken without exposing him to ignominy. So minute was
this supervision that, when Fra Barnaba reported that a colleague had
received a papal brief respecting a certain Lorenzo da Scala, addressed
to the two inquisitors and the Bishop of Scala, Ribagorza ordered it to
be surrendered unopened to the regent of the royal chancery and that all
three addressees should come to Naples when, in their presence and his,
it should be opened and the necessary action be ordered. From a letter
of February 24, 1508, it appears that the old Neapolitan rule was
maintained and that inquisitors had no power to order arrests, but had
to report to Ribagorza, who issued the necessary instructions to the
officials; indeed, a commission of January 14, 1509, indicates that
heretics were seized and brought to Naples before the viceroy, without
the intervention of the Holy Office. At the same time, when inquisitors
were duly commissioned and recognized, the authorities were required to
render them all needful assistance and any impediment thrown in their
way was severely reproved, with threats of condign punishment.[115]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account