The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
A change was at hand when, in 1734, Carlo VII (better known as Carlos
III of Spain) drove the Austrians out of Naples and assumed the throne.
The kingdom, after two centuries of viceroyalties, at last had a
resident monarch of its own, anxious to win the affection of his new
subjects and inclined, as his subsequent career showed, to curb
exorbitant ecclesiastical pretensions. His royal oath included a pledge
to observe the privileges of the land, including those concerning the
Inquisition granted by his predecessor. Apparently for some years there
was hesitation in testing the quality of the new régime, but in 1738 and
1739, as though by concerted action under orders from Rome, Cardinal
Spinelli, the Archbishop of Naples, and various bishops throughout the
kingdom, undertook prosecutions in the prohibited fashion. Complaints
reached the Deputati, who appealed to the king. He reproached them for
negligence, ordered the proceedings stopped and the processes to be sent
to Naples, and gave to Spinelli a warning that such irregularities would
not be permitted. Undeterred by this, the episcopal Inquisition
continued at work and in 1743 three bishops, of Nusco, Ortono and
Cassano, were called to account; the papers of trials held by them were
examined and pronounced irregular; in one case the Bishop of Nusco had
cruelly tortured a parish priest named Gaetano de Arco, after holding
him in prison for eight months.[194]
It seems incredible that under such circumstances ecclesiastical
persistence should defiantly call public attention to its disregard of
the laws, yet on September 26, 1746, the octave of San Gennaro--a time
when the popular afflux to the churches was greatest--an _atto di fede_,
conducted according to inquisitorial practice, was celebrated in the
archiepiscopal church, where a Sicilian priest named Antonio Nava
abjured certain errors and was condemned to perpetual irremissible
prison. Popular indignation was aroused, the cry arose that Spinelli was
endeavoring to introduce the Inquisition and he was insulted in his
carriage by crowds as he drove through the streets. The Deputati
represented to the king that they had been appealed to by three
prisoners whose trials were not conducted by the _via ordinaria_,
showing that the ecclesiastics were seeking to impose the abhorred
Inquisition on the kingdom. Spinelli protested that the trials were open
and according to the _via ordinaria_ and that he was ready to obey
whatever commands he might receive from the king. Carlos sent all the
papers to his council, known as the Camera di Santa Chiara, with orders
to investigate and report.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account