The Inside of the Cup — CompleteChurchill, Winston
Science
The Inside of the Cup — Complete
Churchill, Winston
Attitude change -- Fiction; Christian ethics -- Fiction; Christian life -- Fiction; Conscience -- Religious aspects -- Fiction
“Admirably clear. But we have our Lord's example of how to live here.”
“If we could be sure,” said Eleanor, “just what that example meant.”
Hodder was silent a moment.
“You mean that you cannot accept what the Church teaches about his
life?” he asked.
“No, I can't,” she faltered. “You have helped me to say it. I want to
have the Church's side better explained,--that's why I'm here.” She
glanced up at him, hesitatingly, with a puzzled wonder, such a positive,
dynamic representative of that teaching did he appear. “And my husband
can't,--so many people I know can't, Mr. Hodder. Only, some of them
don't mention the fact. They accept it. And you say things with such a
certainty--” she paused.
“I know,” he replied, “I know. I have felt it since I have come here
more than ever before.” He did not add that he had felt it particularly
about her, about her husband: nor did he give voice to his instinctive
conviction that he respected and admired these two more than a hundred
others whose professed orthodoxy was without a flaw. “What is it in
particular,” he asked, troubled, “that you cannot accept? I will do my
best to help you.”
“Well--” she hesitated again.
“Please continue to be frank,” he begged.
“I can't believe in the doctrine of the virgin birth,” she responded in
a low voice; “it seems to me so--so material. And I feel I am stating a
difficulty that many have, Mr. Hodder. Why should it have been thought
necessary for God to have departed from what is really a sacred and
sublime fact in nature, to resort to a material proof in order to
convince a doubting humanity that Jesus was his Son? Oughtn't the proof
of Christ's essential God-ship to lie in his life, to be discerned by
the spiritual; and wasn't he continually rebuking those who demanded
material proof? The very acceptance of a material proof, it seems to me,
is a denial of faith, since faith ceases to have any worth whatever the
moment the demand for such proof is gratified. Knowledge puts faith out
of the question, for faith to me means a trusting on spiritual grounds.
And surely the acceptance of scriptural statements like that of
the miraculous birth without investigation is not faith--it is mere
credulity. If Jesus had been born in a miraculous way, the disciples
must have known it. Joseph must have known it when he heard the
answer 'I must be about my father's business,' and their doubts are
unexplained.”
“I see you have been investigating,” said the rector.
“Yes,” replied Eleanor, with an unconscious shade of defiance, “people
want to know, Mr. Dodder,--they want to know the truth. And if you
consider the preponderance of the evidence of the Gospels themselves--my
brother-in-law says--you will find that the miraculous birth has very
little to stand on. Take out the first two chapters of Matthew and
Luke, and the rest of the four Gospels practically contradict it. The
genealogies differ, and they both trace through Joseph.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account