The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial artsVeblen, Thorstein
Philosophy
The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial arts
Veblen, Thorstein
Industrial arts -- History; Industries -- History; Technology -- History; Workmanship -- History
For the purposes of a genetic inquiry into this modern business
situation and its bearing on the sense of workmanship and on the
technological phenomena in which that instinct comes to an expression,
it is necessary summarily to recall certain current facts pertinent
to the case: (_a_) It is a competitive system; that is to say it is a
system of pecuniary rivalry and contention which proceeds on stable
institutions of property and contract, under conditions of peace and
order. (_b_) It is a price system, i. e., the competition runs in terms
of money, and the money unit is the standard measure of efficiency and
achievement; hence competition and efficiency are subject to a rigorous
accountancy in terms of a (putatively) stable money unit, which is in
all business traffic assumed to be invariable. (_c_) Technologically
this situation is dominated by the mechanical industries; so much
so that even the arts of husbandry have latterly taken on much of
the character of the mechanic arts. Hence a somewhat thoroughgoing
standardisation of processes and products in mechanical terms; which
for business purposes has with a fair degree of success been made
convertible into terms of price, and so made subject to accountancy
in terms of price. (_d_) Hence consumption is also standardised,
proximately in mechanical terms of consumable products but finally,
through the mechanism of the market, in terms of price, and like other
price phenomena consumption also is competitively subject to and
enforced by the like accountancy in terms of the money unit. (_e_)
The typical industries, which set the pace for productive work, for
competitive gains, and through the standard rates of gain ultimately
also for competitive consumption, are industries carried on on a large
scale; that is to say they are such as to require a large material
equipment, a wide recourse to technological insight and proficiency,
and a large draught on the material resources of the community. (_f_)
This material equipment--industrial plant and natural resources--is
held in private ownership, with negligible exceptions; the noteworthy
exceptions to this rule, as e. g., harbours, highways, and the like,
serving chiefly as accessory means of industry and so come in chiefly
as a gratuitous supplement to the industrial equipment held in private
ownership and used for competitive gain. (_g_) Technological knowledge
and proficiency is in the main held and transmitted pervasively by
the community at large, but it is also held in part--more obviously
because exceptionally--by specially trained classes and individual
workmen. Relatively little, in effect a negligible proportion, of
this technological knowledge and skill is in any special sense held
by the owners of the industrial equipment, more particularly not by
the owners of the typical large-scale industries. That is to say,
the technologically proficient workmen do not in the typical case
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account