The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial artsVeblen, Thorstein
Philosophy
The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial arts
Veblen, Thorstein
Industrial arts -- History; Industries -- History; Technology -- History; Workmanship -- History
own or control any appreciable proportion of the material equipment
or of the natural resources to which this technological knowledge
and skill applies and in the use of which it takes effect. (_h_) It
results that the owners of this large material equipment, including the
natural resources, have a discretionary control of the technological
proficiency of the community at large, as well as of those special
lines of insight and skill that are vested in these specially trained
expert men in whom a specialised proficiency is added to the general
proficiency that is diffused through the community at large. (_i_) In
effect, therefore, the owners of the necessary material equipment own
also the working capacity of the community and the usufruct of the
state of the industrial arts. Except for their effective ownership
of these elements of productive efficiency their ownership of the
material equipment of industry would be of no effect. But the usufruct
of this productive capacity of the community and its trained workmen
vests in the owners of the material equipment only with the contingent
qualification that if the community does this work it must be allowed
a livelihood, whereby the gross returns that go in the first instance
to these owners suffer abatement by that much. This required livelihood
is adjusted to a conventional standard of living which, under the
current circumstances of pecuniary emulation, is in great part--perhaps
chiefly--a standardised schedule of conspicuous waste.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account