The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial artsVeblen, Thorstein
Philosophy
The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial arts
Veblen, Thorstein
Industrial arts -- History; Industries -- History; Technology -- History; Workmanship -- History
CHAPTER I
PAGE
INTRODUCTORY 1
CHAPTER II
CONTAMINATION OF INSTINCTS IN PRIMITIVE TECHNOLOGY 38
CHAPTER III
THE SAVAGE STATE OF THE INDUSTRIAL ARTS 103
CHAPTER IV
THE TECHNOLOGY OF THE PREDATORY CULTURE 138
CHAPTER V
OWNERSHIP AND THE COMPETITIVE SYSTEM 187
CHAPTER VI
THE ERA OF HANDICRAFT 231
CHAPTER VII
THE MACHINE INDUSTRY 299
THE INSTINCT OF WORKMANSHIP
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTORY
For mankind as for the other higher animals, the life of the species
is conditioned by the complement of instinctive proclivities and
tropismatic aptitudes with which the species is typically endowed. Not
only is the continued life of the race dependent on the adequacy of its
instinctive proclivities in this way, but the routine and details of
its life are also, in the last resort, determined by these instincts.
These are the prime movers in human behaviour, as in the behaviour
of all those animals that show self-direction or discretion. Human
activity, in so far as it can be spoken of as conduct, can never exceed
the scope of these instinctive dispositions, by initiative of which man
takes action. Nothing falls within the human scheme of things desirable
to be done except what answers to these native proclivities of man.
These native proclivities alone make anything worth while, and out of
their working emerge not only the purpose and efficiency of life, but
its substantial pleasures and pains as well.
* * * * *
Latterly the words “instinct” and “instinctive” are no longer well
seen among students of those biological sciences where they once had
a great vogue. Students who occupy themselves with the psychology
of animal behaviour are cautiously avoiding these expressions, and
in this caution they are doubtless well advised. For such use the
word appears no longer to be serviceable as a technical term. It has
lost the requisite sharp definition and consistency of connotation,
apparently through disintegration under a more searching analysis
than the phenomena comprised under this concept had previously been
subjected to. In these biological sciences interest is centering not on
the question of what activities may be set down to innate propensity
or predisposition at large, but rather on the determination of the
irreducible psychological--and, indeed, physiological--elements that
go to make up animal behaviour. For this purpose “instinct” is a
concept of too lax and shifty a definition to meet the demands of exact
biological science.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account