The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial artsVeblen, Thorstein
Philosophy
The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial arts
Veblen, Thorstein
Industrial arts -- History; Industries -- History; Technology -- History; Workmanship -- History
There are few lines of instinctive proclivity that are not crossed and
coloured by some ramification of the instinct of workmanship. No doubt,
response to the direct call of such half-tropismatic, half-instinctive
impulses as hunger, anger, or the promptings of sex, is little if at
all troubled with any sentimental suffusion of workmanship; but in
the more complex and deliberate activities, particularly where habit
exerts an appreciable effect, the impulse and sentiment of workmanship
comes in for a large share in the outcome. So much so, indeed, that,
for instance, in the arts, where the sense of beauty is the prime
mover, habitual attention to technique will often put the original,
and only ostensible, motive in the background. So, again, in the life
of religious faith and observance it may happen now and again that
theological niceties and ritual elaboration will successfully, and
in great measure satisfactorily, substitute themselves for spiritual
communion; while in the courts of law a tenacious following out of
legal technicalities will not infrequently defeat the ends of justice.
As the expression is here understood, all instinctive action is
intelligent in some degree; though the degree in which intelligence is
engaged may vary widely from one instinctive disposition to another,
and it may even fall into an extremely automatic shape in the case
of some of the simpler instincts, whose functional content is of a
patently physiological character. Such approach to automatism is even
more evident in some of the lower animals, where, as for instance in
the case of some insects, the response to the appropriate stimuli is
so far uniform and mechanically determinate as to leave it doubtful
whether the behaviour of the animal might not best be construed
as tropismatic action simply.[14] Such tropismatic directness of
instinctive response is less characteristic of man even in the case
of the simpler instinctive proclivities; and the indirection which so
characterises instinctive action in general, and the higher instincts
of man in particular, and which marks off the instinctive dispositions
from the tropisms, is the indirection of intelligence. It enters more
largely in the discharge of some proclivities than of others; but
all instinctive action is intelligent in some degree. This is what
marks it off from the tropisms and takes it out of the category of
automatism.[15]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account