The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial artsVeblen, Thorstein
Philosophy
The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial arts
Veblen, Thorstein
Industrial arts -- History; Industries -- History; Technology -- History; Workmanship -- History
But under the conditions engendered by the machine technology the
scope of this pecuniary standard of workmanship has been greatly
enlarged. On the whole the machine industry calls for a large-scale
organisation, increasingly so as time has passed and the machine
process has come more fully to dominate the industrial situation. By
the same move initiative and discretion have come to vest in those
who can claim ownership of the large material equipment so required,
and the exercise of such initiative and discretion by these owners
is loosely proportioned to the magnitude of their holdings. Smaller
owners have the same freedom of initiative and discretion, in point
of legal and conventional competency,--such freedom and equality
between persons being of the essence of Natural Rights; but in point
of practical fact, as determined by technological and business
exigencies, there is but small discretion left such smaller holders.
Initiative and discretion in modern industrial matters vest in the
owners of the industrial plant, or in such moneyed concerns as may
stand in an underwriting relation to the owners of the plant; such
discretion is exercised through pecuniary transactions; and these
pecuniary transactions whereby the conduct of industry is guided and
controlled are entered into with a view to gain in terms of price.
It is but a slight exaggeration to say that such transactions, which
govern the course of industry, are carried out with an eye single to
pecuniary gain,--the industrial consequences, and their bearing on
the community’s welfare, being matters incidental to the transaction
of business. In every-day phrase, under the rule of the current
technology and business principles, industry is managed by businessmen
for business ends, not by technological experts or for the material
advantage of the community. And in this control of industrial affairs
the smaller businessmen are in great part subject to the discretion of
the larger.[153]
By ancient habit, handed down from the days of handicraft and petty
trade, this pecuniary management is conventionally conceived to be
directed to the production of goods and services, and the businessman
is still conventionally rated as a producer and his gains accepted as a
measure of his productive efficiency. In conventional speech “producer”
means the owner of industrial plant, not the workmen employed nor
the mechanical apparatus about which they are employed.[154] The
“producers,” “manufacturers,” “captains of industry,” whose interests
are safeguarded by current legislation and by the guardians of law and
order are the businessmen who have a pecuniary interest in industrial
affairs; and it is their pecuniary interests that are so safeguarded,
in the naïve faith that the material interests of the community at
large coincide with the opportunities for gain so secured to the
businessmen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account