The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial artsVeblen, Thorstein
Philosophy
The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial arts
Veblen, Thorstein
Industrial arts -- History; Industries -- History; Technology -- History; Workmanship -- History
The point of contrast may be unfamiliar, and an illustration may
be pertinent. So, in the instinct of pugnacity and its attendant
sentiment of anger[16] the primary impulse is doubtless to a direct
frontal attack, assault and battery pure and simple; and the more
highly charged the agent is with the combative impulse, and the higher
the pitch of animation to which he has been wrought up, the less is
he inclined or able to take thought of how he may shrewdly bring
mechanical devices to bear on the object of his sentiment and compass
his end with the largest result per unit of force expended. It is
only the well-trained fighter that will take without reflection to
workmanlike ways and means at such a juncture; and in case of extreme
exasperation and urgency even such a one, it is said, may forget
his workmanship in the premises and throw himself into the middle
of things instead of resorting to the indirections and leverages to
which his workmanlike training in the art of fighting has habituated
him. So, again, the immediate promptings of the parental bent urge
to direct personal intervention and service in behalf of the object
of solicitude. In persons highly gifted in this respect the impulse
asserts itself to succour the helpless with one’s own hands, to do for
them in one’s own person not what might on reflection approve itself
as the most expedient line of conduct in the premises, but what will
throw the agent most personally into action in the case. Notoriously,
it is easier to move well-meaning people to unreflecting charity on an
immediate and concrete appeal than it is to secure a sagacious, well
sustained and well organised concert of endeavour for the amelioration
of the lot of the unfortunate. Indeed, refinements of workmanlike
calculation of causes and effects in such a case are instinctively felt
to be out of touch with the spirit of the thing. They are distasteful;
not only are they not part and parcel of the functional content of
the generous impulse, but an undue injection of these elements of
workmanship into the case may even induce a revulsion of feeling and
defeat its own intention.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account