The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial artsVeblen, Thorstein
Philosophy
The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial arts
Veblen, Thorstein
Industrial arts -- History; Industries -- History; Technology -- History; Workmanship -- History
Within this common stock of technology some special branch or line of
proficiency, bearing on some special craft or trade, may be held in
a degree of isolation by some caste-like group within the community,
limited by consanguinity, initiation, and the like, and so it may be
held somewhat out of the common stock and transmitted in some degree
of segregation. In the lower cultures the elements of technology that
are so engrossed by a fraction of the community and held out of the
common stock are most commonly of a magical or ceremonial nature,
rather than effective elements of workmanship; since any such matters
of ritual observance lend themselves with greater facility to exclusive
use and transmission within lines of class limitation than do the
matter-of-fact devices of actual workmanship. In the lower cultures
the exclusive training and information so held and transmitted in
segregation by various secret organisations appear in the main to be
of this magical or ceremonial character;[61] although there is no
reason to doubt that this technological make-believe is taken quite
seriously and counts as a substantial asset in the apprehension of its
possessors. In a more advanced state of the industrial arts, where
ownership and the specialisation of industry have had their effect,
trade secrets, patent and copyrights are often of substantial value,
and these are held in segregation from the common stock of technology.
But it is evident without argument that facts of this class are after
all of no grave or enduring consequence in comparison with the great
commonplace body of knowledge and skill current in the community. At
the same time, any such segregated line of technological gain and
transmission, if it has any appreciable significance for the state of
the industrial arts and is not wholly made up of ritual observances,
leans so greatly on the technological equipment at large that its
isolation is at the most partial and one-sided; it takes effect only
by the free use of the general body of knowledge which is not so
engrossed, and it has also in all cases been acquired and elaborated
only by the free use of that commonplace knowledge that is held in
no man’s exclusive possession. Such is more particularly the case in
all but those latest phases of the industrial development in which
the volume of the technology and the consequent specialisation of
occupations have been carried very far.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account