The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial artsVeblen, Thorstein
Philosophy
The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial arts
Veblen, Thorstein
Industrial arts -- History; Industries -- History; Technology -- History; Workmanship -- History
In the earlier, or rather in all but the late phases of culture and
technology, this immaterial equipment at large is accessible to all
members of the community as a matter of course through the unavoidable
discipline that comes with the workday routine of getting along. Few,
if any, can avoid acquiring the essential elements of the industrial
scheme by use of which the community lives, although they need not
each gain any degree of proficiency in all the manual operations or
industrial processes in which this technological scheme goes into
effect, and few can avoid being so trained into the logic of the
current scheme that their habitual thinking will in all these bearings
run within the bounds of experience embodied in this general scheme.
All have free access to this common stock of immaterial equipment,
but in all known cultures there is also found some degree of special
training and some appreciable specialisation of knowledge and
occupations; which is carried forward by expert workmen whose peculiar
and exceptional proficiency is confined to some one or a few distinct
lines of craft. And in all, or at least in all but the lowest known
cultures, the available evidence goes to say that this joint stock of
technological mastery can be maintained and carried forward only by
way of some such specialisation of training and differentiation of
employments. No one is competent to acquire such mastery of all the
lines of industry included in the general scheme as would enable him
(or her) to transmit the state of the industrial arts to succeeding
generations unimpaired at all points.
Some degree of specialisation there always is, even where there appears
to be no urgent technological need of it. The circumstances of their
life differ sufficiently for different individuals, so that a certain
individuation in workmanship will result from commonplace experience,
even apart from any deliberate specialisation of occupations. And with
any considerable increase in the size of the group a more or less
deliberate specialisation of occupations will also set in. Individuals
who are in this way occupied wholly or mainly with some one particular
line of work will carry proficiency in this line to a higher pitch than
the generality of workmen and will bring out details of technological
procedure that may never fully become the common possession of the
group at large, that may not in all details become part of the
commonplace technological information current in the community. There
seems, in fact, never to have been a time when the industrial scheme
was so slight and narrow that all members of the community could master
it in the greatest feasible degree of proficiency at every point. But
at the same time it holds true for all the more archaic phases of the
development that all members of the community appear always to have had
a comprehensive and passably exhaustive acquaintance with the technique
of all industries practised in their time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account