The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial artsVeblen, Thorstein
Philosophy
The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial arts
Veblen, Thorstein
Industrial arts -- History; Industries -- History; Technology -- History; Workmanship -- History
In many of its details this prehistoric culture shows something of
the same facility in the use of mechanical expedients as has come so
notably forward again in the late development of the industrial arts of
western Europe. It is in its mechanical efficiency that the technology
of the latterday Western culture stands out preëminent, and it is
similarly its easy command of the mechanical factors with which it
deals that chiefly distinguishes the prehistoric technology of North
Europe. In other respects the prehistoric material from this region
does not argue a high level of civilisation. There are no ornate or
stupendous structures; what there is of the kind is mounds and barrows
of moderately great size and using only undressed stone where any
is used, but making a mechanically effective use of this. There is,
indeed, nothing from the stone age in the way of edifices, fabrics or
decorative work that is to be classed, in point of excellence in design
or execution, with the polished-flint woodworking axe or chisel of that
time. From the bronze age at its best there is much excellent bronze
work of great merit both in workmanship and in decorative effect; but
the artistic merit of this work (from the middle and early half of the
bronze age) lies almost wholly in its workmanlike execution and in
the freedom and adequacy with which very simple mechanical elements
of decoration are employed. It is an art which appeals to the sense
of beauty chiefly through the sense of workmanship, shown both in the
choice of materials and decorative elements and in the use made of
them. When this art aspires to more ambitious decorative effects or to
representation of life forms, or indeed to any representation that has
not been conventionalised almost past recognition, as it does in the
later periods of the bronze age, the result is that it can be commended
for its workmanship alone, and so far as regards artistic effect it is
mainly misspent workmanship.[88]
The same workmanlike insight and facility comes in evidence in the
matter of borrowing, already spoken of. Borrowing goes on throughout
this prehistoric culture, and the borrowed elements are assimilated
with such despatch and effect as to make them seem home-bred almost
from the start. It is a borrowing of technological elements, which are
rarely employed except in full and competent adaptation to the uses
to which they are turned; so much so that the archæologists find it
exceptionally difficult to trace the borrowed elements to specific
sources, in spite of the great volume and frequency of this borrowing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account