The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalismShaw, Bernard
General
The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalism
Shaw, Bernard
Capitalism; Socialism
These changes involve another which is politically very important.
When the employers had it all their own way, and were in business for
themselves separately and independently, they worked with what we
should call small capitals, and had no difficulty in getting them.
Capital was positively thrown down their throats by the bankers, who,
as we shall see later, have most of the spare money to keep. Those were
the days of arrogant cotton lords and merchant princes. The man who
could manage a business took every penny that was left in the till when
the landlord had had his rent, the capitalist (who was often himself)
his interest, and the employees their wages. If he were a capable man,
what remained for him as profit was enough to make him rich enough to
go into Parliament if he cared to. Sometimes it was enough to enable
him to buy his way into the peerage. Capital being useless and Labor
helpless without him, he was, as an American economist put it, master
of the situation.
When joint stock companies, which were formerly supposed to be suitable
for banking and insurance only, came into business generally, the
situation of the employers began to change. In a joint stock concern
you have, instead of one or two capitalists, hundreds of capitalists,
called shareholders, each contributing what spare money she or he
can afford. It began with £100 shares, and has gone on to £10 and
£1 shares; so that a single business today may belong to a host of
capitalist proprietors, many of them much poorer people than could ever
have acquired property in pre-company days. This had two results. One
was that a woman with a £5 note to spare could allow a company to spend
it, and thereby become entitled to, say, five shillings a year out of
the gains of that company as long as it lasted. In this way Capitalism
was strengthened by the extension of property in industry from rich
people with large sums of spare money to poor people with small ones.
But the employers were weakened, and finally lost their supremacy and
became employees.
It happened in this way. The joint stock company system made it
possible to collect much larger capitals to start business with than
the old separate firms could command. It was already known that the
employer with a thousand pounds worth of machinery and other aids
to production (called plant) could be undersold and driven out of
the market by the employer with twenty thousand pounds worth. Still,
employers could get twenty thousand pounds lent to them easily enough
if it was believed that they could handle it profitably. But when
companies came into the field equipped with hundreds of thousands of
pounds, and these companies began to combine into Trusts equipped with
millions, the employers were outdone. They could not raise such sums
among their acquaintances. No bank would allow them to overdraw their
accounts on such a gigantic scale. To get more capital, they had to
turn their businesses into joint stock companies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account