The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalismShaw, Bernard
General
The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalism
Shaw, Bernard
Capitalism; Socialism
Even at this they cannot all get employment. Although the plea made
for Capitalism by the professors of The Manchester School was that at
least it would always provide the workers with employment at a living
wage, it has never either kept that promise or justified that plea.
The employers have had to confess that they need what is called “a
reserve army of unemployed”, so that they can always pick up “hands”
when trade is good and throw them back into the street when it is bad.
Throwing them back into the street means forcing them to spend the few
shillings they may have been able to put by while employed, selling or
pawning their clothes and furniture, and finally going on the rates
as paupers. The ratepayers naturally object very strongly to having
to support the employer’s workmen whenever he does not happen to want
them; consequently, when the Capitalist system developed on a large
scale, the ratepayers made Poor Law relief such a disgraceful, cruel,
and degrading business that decent working class families would suffer
any extremity rather than resort to it. We said to the unemployed
father of a starving family, “We must feed you and your children if
you are destitute, because the Statute of Elizabeth obliges us to; but
you must bring your daughters and sons into the workhouse with you
to live with drunkards, prostitutes, tramps, idiots, epileptics, old
criminals, the very dregs and refuse of human society at its worst,
and having done that you will never be able to hold up your head again
among your fellows”. The man naturally said “Thank you: I had rather
see my children dead”, and starved it out as best he could until trade
revived, and the employers had another job for him. And to get that job
he would accept the barest wages the family could support life on. If
his children could earn a little in a factory he would snatch at wages
that were just enough, when the children’s earnings were thrown in, to
support them all; and in this way he did not benefit in the long run
by letting his children go out to work, as it ended in their earnings
being used to beat down his own wages; so that, though he at first sent
his children into the factories to get a little extra money, he was at
last forced to do it to make up his own wages to subsistence point;
and when the law stepped in to rescue the children from their slavery,
he opposed the law because he did not see how he could live unless his
children earned something instead of going to school.
48
WOMEN IN THE LABOR MARKET
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account