The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalismShaw, Bernard
General
The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalism
Shaw, Bernard
Capitalism; Socialism
There are cases, too, where the wedding ring may be a drawback instead
of a makeweight. Illicit unions are so common under the Capitalist
system that the Government has had to deal with them; and the law at
present is that if an unmarried woman bears a child she can compel its
father to pay her seven-and-sixpence a week for its support until it is
sixteen, at which age it can begin to help to support her. Meanwhile
the child belongs to her instead of to the father (it would belong to
him if they were married); and she is free from any obligation to keep
his house or do any ordinary drudgery for him. Rather than be brought
into court he will pay without demur; and when he is goodnatured and
not too poor he will often pay her more than he is legally obliged
to. The effect of this is that a careful, discreet, sensible,
pleasant sort of woman who has not scrupled to bear five illegitimate
children may find herself with a legally guaranteed steady income of
thirty-seven-and-sixpence a week in addition to what she can earn by
respectable work. Compared to a widow with five legitimate children
she was on velvet until the Government, after centuries of blind
neglect, began to pension widows.
In short, Capitalism acts on women as a continual bribe to enter into
sex relations for money, whether in or out of marriage; and against
this bribe there stands nothing beyond the traditional respectability
which Capitalism ruthlessly destroys by poverty, except religion and
the inborn sense of honor which has its citadel in the soul and can
hold out (sometimes) against all circumstances.
It is useless to pretend that religion and tradition and honor always
win the day. It is now a century and a half since the poet Oliver
Goldsmith warned us that “Honor sinks where commerce long prevails”;
and the economic pressure by which Capitalism tempts women grew fiercer
after his time. We have just seen how in the case of the parents
sending their children out to work in their infancy to add a little to
the family income, they found that their wages fell until what they and
the children between them could earn was no more than they had been
able to earn by themselves before, so that in order to live they now
had to send their children to work whether they liked it or not. In
the same way the women who occasionally picked up a little extra money
illicitly, presently found themselves driven to snatch at employment
by offering to take lower wages and depending on the other resource to
make them up to subsistence point. Then the women who stood on their
honor were offered those reduced wages, and, when they said they could
not live on them, were told as usual that others could, and that they
could do what the others did.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account