The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalismShaw, Bernard
General
The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalism
Shaw, Bernard
Capitalism; Socialism
But you cannot alter anything unless you know what you want to alter it
to. It is no use saying that it is scandalous that Mrs A. should have
a thousand pounds a day and poor Mrs B. only half a crown. If you want
the law altered you must be prepared to say how much you think Mrs A.
should have, and how much Mrs B. should have. And that is where the
real trouble begins. We are all ready to say that Mrs B. ought to have
more, and Mrs A. less; but when we are asked to say exactly how much
more and how much less, some say one thing; others say another; and
most of us have nothing to say at all except perhaps that Mrs A. ought
to be ashamed of herself or that it serves Mrs B. right.
People who have never thought about the matter say that the honest way
is to let everyone have what she has the money to pay for, just as at
present. But that does not get us out of the difficulty. It only sets
us asking how the money is to be allotted. Money is only a bit of paper
or a bit of metal that gives its owner a lawful claim to so much bread
or beer or diamonds or motor-cars or what not. We cannot eat money, nor
drink money, nor wear money. It is the goods that money can buy that
are being divided-up when money is divided-up. Everything is reckoned
in money; and when the law gives Mrs B. her ten shillings when she is
seventy years old and young Master A. his three thousand shillings
before he is seven minutes old, the law is dividing-up the loaves
and fishes, the clothes and houses, the motor-cars and perambulators
between them as if it were handing out these articles directly instead
of handing out the money that buys them.
4
NO WEALTH WITHOUT WORK
Before there can be any wealth to divide-up, there must be labor at
work. There can be no loaves without farmers and bakers. There are a
few little islands thousands of miles away where men and women can lie
basking in the sun and live on the cocoa-nuts the monkeys throw down to
them. But for us there is no such possibility. Without incessant daily
labor we should starve. If anyone is idle someone else must be working
for both or there would be nothing for either of them to eat. That was
why St Paul said “If a man will not work neither shall he eat”. The
burden of labor is imposed on us by Nature, and has to be divided-up as
well as the wealth it produces.
But the two divisions need not correspond to oneanother. One person
can produce much more than enough to feed herself. Otherwise the young
children could not be fed; and the old people who are past work would
starve. Many a woman with nothing to help her but her two hands has
brought up a family on her own earnings, and kept her aged parents into
the bargain, besides making rent for a ground landlord as well. And
with the help of water power, steam power, electric power, and modern
machinery, labor can be so organized that one woman can turn out more
than a thousand women could turn out 150 years ago.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account