The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalismShaw, Bernard
General
The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalism
Shaw, Bernard
Capitalism; Socialism
enough to have any character at all. The notion that our present system
distributes wealth according to merit, even roughly, may be dismissed
at once as ridiculous. Everyone can see that it generally has the
contrary effect: it makes a few idle people very rich, and a great many
hardworking people very poor.
On this, Intelligent Lady, your first thought may be that if wealth is
not distributed according to merit, it ought to be; and that we should
at once set to work to alter our laws so that in future the good people
shall be rich in proportion to their goodness and the bad people poor
in proportion to their badness. There are several objections to this;
but the very first one settles the question for good and all. It is,
that the proposal is impossible. How are you going to measure anyone’s
merit in money? Choose any pair of human beings you like, male or
female, and see whether you can decide how much each of them should
have on her or his merits. If you live in the country, take the village
blacksmith and the village clergyman, or the village washerwoman and
the village schoolmistress, to begin with. At present the clergyman
often gets less pay than the blacksmith: it is only in some villages
he gets more. But never mind what they get at present: you are trying
whether you can set up a new order of things in which each will get
what he deserves. You need not fix a sum of money for them: all you
have to do is to settle the proportion between them. Is the blacksmith
to have as much as the clergyman? or twice as much as the clergyman?
or half as much as the clergyman? or how much more or less? It is no
use saying that one ought to have more and the other less: you must be
prepared to say exactly how much more or less in calculable proportion.
Well, think it out. The clergyman has had a college education; but
that is not any merit on his part: he owes it to his father; so you
cannot allow him anything for that. But through it he is able to read
the New Testament in Greek; so that he can do something the blacksmith
cannot do. On the other hand, the blacksmith can make a horse-shoe,
which the parson cannot. How many verses of the Greek Testament are
worth one horse-shoe? You have only to ask the silly question to see
that nobody can answer it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account