The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalismShaw, Bernard
General
The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalism
Shaw, Bernard
Capitalism; Socialism
Since measuring their merits is no use, why not try to measure their
faults? Suppose the blacksmith swears a good deal, and gets drunk
occasionally! Everybody in the village knows this; but the parson has
to keep his faults to himself. His wife knows them; but she will not
tell you what they are if she knows that you intend to cut off some of
his pay for them. You know that as he is only a mortal human being he
must have some faults; but you cannot find them out. However, suppose
he has some faults that you can find out! Suppose he has what you call
an unfortunate manner; that he is a hypocrite; that he is a snob; that
he cares more for sport and fashionable society than for religion! Does
that make him as bad as the blacksmith, or twice as bad, or twice and a
quarter as bad, or only half as bad? In other words, if the blacksmith
is to have a shilling, is the parson to have a shilling also, or is he
to have sixpence, or fivepence and one-third, or two shillings? Clearly
these are fools’ questions: the moment they bring us down from moral
generalities to business particulars it becomes plain to every sensible
person that no relation can be established between human qualities,
good or bad, and sums of money, large or small. It may seem scandalous
that a prize-fighter, for hitting another prize-fighter so hard at
Wembley that he fell down and could not rise within ten seconds,
received the same sum that was paid to the Archbishop of Canterbury for
acting as Primate of the Church of England for nine months; but none of
those who cry out against the scandal can express any better in money
the difference between the two. Not one of the persons who think that
the prize-fighter should get less than the Archbishop can say how much
less. What the prize-fighter got for his six or seven minutes boxing
would pay a judge’s salary for two years; and we are all agreed that
nothing could be more ridiculous, and that any system of distributing
wealth which leads to such absurdities must be wrong. But to suppose
that it could be changed by any possible calculation that an ounce of
archbishop or three ounces of judge is worth a pound of prize-fighter
would be sillier still. You can find out how many candles are worth a
pound of butter in the market on any particular day; but when you try
to estimate the worth of human souls the utmost you can say is that
they are all of equal value before the throne of God. And that will not
help you in the least to settle how much money they should have. You
must simply give it up, and admit that distributing money according to
merit is beyond mortal measurement and judgment.
10
TO EACH WHAT SHE CAN GRAB
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account