The International Magazine, Volume 2, No. 2, January, 1851Various
History
The International Magazine, Volume 2, No. 2, January, 1851
Various
Art, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Science -- History -- Periodicals
between Panama and California than between Bombay and China. The causes
of these results are plain enough to us, but to the English they are
enigmas. The mission of Mr. Mackay will scarcely end in a revelation of
the truth, that liberty and independence have kept healthy the blood in
the vigorous limbs of the Americans, while trammels and vassalage have
deadened the energies of the Indies; but it may have an important
influence upon the question whether the East India Company's charter
shall be renewed, and it certainly will develop much information
interesting to the cotton-growers of the United States.
* * * * *
MR. DE QUINCEY is one of the greatest of the elder race of literary men
now living in Great Britain, and we believe he is in no very affluent
circumstances. The bestowal of a pension by the Government upon Mr.
James Bailey, an editor of the classics, residing at Cambridge, on the
ground of his "literary services," causes _The Leader_ thus to refer to
the author of "The Opium Eater"--
"Where is Thomas De Quincey's pension? Some may not regard him,
as we do, the very greatest living master of the English
language; some may think lightly of those fragmentary works and
fugitive articles with which he has for more than thirty years
enriched our literature; but, whatever may be the individual
estimate of his services, one fact is patent, namely, that you
cannot mention De Quincey in any circle of the British Islands,
pretending to literary culture, but his name will sound
familiar; in most it will awaken responses of gratitude for
high pleasures bestowed, in none will it arouse indignation of
high power to base uses. Now, this we call a clear case for
national beneficence. He has done the state service, and they
know it; but they will not reward it."
Apropos of pensions: Upon the whole, we have the best exchequer in the
world, and to _soldiers_ we have evinced no special lack of liberality.
To give five hundred dollars a year to Mr. Audubon, R. H. Dana, Moses
Stuart, Edward Robinson, H. R. Schoolcraft, James G. Percival, C. F.
Hoffman, and some half dozen others, would be something toward an
"honorable discharge" of the country's obligations in the premises, and
probably no slight addition to the happiness of men who have added much
to the real glory of the nation, while it would cost less than a
morning's useless debate in Congress. In a recent letter to Lord
Brougham, on a cognate subject, Savage Landor exclaims:
"Probably the time is not far distant when the arts and
sciences, and even literary genius, may be deemed no less
worthy of this distinction than the slaughter of a thousand
men. But how, in the midst of our vast expenditure, spare so
prodigious a sum as five hundred a year to six, and three
hundred a year to six more!"
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account