The International Monthly, Volume 3, No. 3, June, 1851Various
History
The International Monthly, Volume 3, No. 3, June, 1851
Various
Art, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Science -- History -- Periodicals
Our great idea of civility is, that the person who is poor should be
exceedingly civil to the person who is wealthy: and this is the
difference between the neighboring nations. Your Frenchman admits no
one to be quite his equal--your Englishman worships every one richer
than himself as undeniably his superior. Judge us from our servants
and our shopkeepers, it is true we are the politest people in the
world. The servants, who are paid well, and the shopkeepers, who sell
high--scrape, and cringe, and smile. There is no country where those
who have wealth are treated so politely by those to whom it goes; but
at the same time there is no country where those who are well off live
on such cold, and suspicious, and ill-natured, and uncivil terms among
themselves.
The rich man who travels in France murmurs at every inn and at every
shop; not only is he treated no better for being a rich man--he is
treated worse in many places, from the idea that because he is rich he
is likely to give himself airs. But if the lower classes are more rude
to the higher classes than with us, the higher classes in France are
far less rude to one another. The dandy who did not look at an old
acquaintance, or who looked impertinently at a stranger, would have
his nose pulled and his body run through with a small-sword--or
damaged by a pistol-bullet--before the evening was well over. Where
every man wishes to be higher than he is, there you find people
insolent to their fellows, and exacting obsequiousness from their
inferiors--where men will allow no one to be superior to themselves,
there you see them neither civil to those above them, nor impertinent
to those beneath them, nor yet very courteous to those in the same
station. The manners, checkered in one country by softness and
insolence, are not sufficiently courteous and gentle in the other.
Time was in France, (it existed in England to a late date,) when
politeness was thought to consist in placing every one at his ease. A
quiet sense of their own dignity rendered persons insensible to the
fear of its being momentarily forgotten. Upon these days rested the
shadow of a bygone chivalry, which accounted courtesy as one of the
virtues. The civility of that epoch, as contrasted with the civility
of ours, was not the civility of the domestic or the tradesman, meant
to pamper the pride of their employer, but the civility of the noble
and the gentleman, meant to elevate the modesty of those who
considered themselves in an inferior state. Corrupted by the largesses
of an expensive and intriguing court, the "grand seigneur," after the
reign of Louis XIV., became over-civil and servile to those above him.
Beneath the star of the French minister beat the present heart of the
British mercer--and softly did the great man smile on those from whom
he had any thing to gain. As whatever was taught at Versailles was
learnt in the Rue St. Denis, when the courtier had the air of a
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account