The International Monthly, Volume 4, No. 4, November 1, 1851Various
History
The International Monthly, Volume 4, No. 4, November 1, 1851
Various
Art, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Science -- History -- Periodicals
"You see, my friends, I was right in not putting my tragedy on paper."
"Why so?" asked Godoyn.
"Because, I should have had the trouble of throwing it into the fire. Now,
I shall merely have to forget it, which is easier done."
When Crebillon seemed no longer formidable in the literary world, and all
were agreed he was in the decline of his genius, the very men who had
previously denied his power, now thought fit to combat Voltaire by exalting
Crebillon, in the same way as they afterwards exalted Voltaire so soon as
another star appeared on the literary horizon.
"With the intention of humbling the pride of Voltaire, they proceeded,"
says a writer of the time, "to seek out in his lonely retreat the now aged
and forsaken Crebillon, who, mute and solitary for the last thirty years,
was no longer a formidable enemy for them, but whom they flattered
themselves they could oppose as a species of phantom to the illustrious
writer by whom they were eclipsed; just as, in former days, the Leaguers
drew an old cardinal from out the obscurity in which he lived, to give
him the empty title of king, only that they themselves might reign under
his name."
The literary world was then divided into two adverse parties--the
Crebillonists, and the Voltairians. The first, being masters of all the
avenues, succeeded for a length of time in blinding the public. Voltaire
passed for a mere wit; Crebillon, for the sole heir of the sceptre of
Corneille and Racine. It was this clique which invented the formula ever
afterwards employed in the designation of these three poets--Corneille the
great, Racine the tender, and Crebillon the tragic. One great advantage
Crebillon possessed over Voltaire: he had written nothing for the last
thirty years. His friends, or rather Voltaire's enemies, now began to give
out that the author of "Rhadamiste" was engaged in putting the finishing
hand to a tragedy, a veritable dramatic wonder, by name "Catilina." Madame
de Pompadour herself, tired of Voltaire's importunate ambition, now went
over with her forces to the camp of the Crebillonists. She received
Crebillon at court, and recommended him to the particular care of Louis
XV., who conferred a pension on him, and also appointed him to the office
of censor royal.
"Catilina" was at length produced with great _éclat_. The court party,
which was present in force at the first performance, doubtless contributed
in a great measure to the success of the piece. The old poet, thus
encouraged, set to work on a new play, the "Triumvirat," with fresh ardor;
but as was Voltaire's lot in after years, it was soon perceptible that the
poet was but the shadow of what he had been. Out of respect, however, for
Crebillon's eighty-eight years, the tragedy was applauded, but in a few
days the "Triumvirat" was played to empty benches. Crebillon had now but
one thing left to do: to die, which, in fact, he did in the year 1762.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account