All the acids named have the property, previously mentioned, of etching
the stone rough if it has been prepared before or used for impressions.
It seems that the gum unites more strongly with some parts of the stone
than with others, admitting the acid in these latter places. Possibly,
also, the bubbles caused by etching may help to produce this roughness
by hindering the uniform action of the acid. This seems to be confirmed
by the fact that an etched stone, prepared with gum, does not get nearly
so rough when etched again with very weak acid as it does when stronger
fluid is used.
In still greater degree does this appear when using citric acid or a
solution of alum in water. Take a finely ground stone, pour diluted
aquafortis over it, prepare it with the gum solution, and then dry it
thoroughly with a clean rag. Now pour a little citric acid or alum
solution on parts of it and let it dry. Then paint the parts so treated
with a fat or printing-ink. If the color is rubbed off with a wet rag,
it will be seen that the stone has become white again in all places
except those where the citric acid or alum are. Those parts will have
taken the color exactly as if they had been painted with chemical ink.
The same occurs when applying other acids, but in a lesser degree. This
effect will be mentioned in future for many methods. Here I will remark
only:--
It happens often that the stone takes color on places where it should
remain clean. This is caused by clumsy handling, unclean rags, etc., and
occurs particularly at the ends, because they dry first and are more
exposed to careless manipulation. These smutted places usually can be
cleansed with a clean woolen rag and gum solution or even with a wetted
clean finger. But sometimes the defect will not yield so easily,
especially if the printing-color is soft. Then the only remedy is to
prepare the stone over again, and that is the time when one must have
regard to the roughening that ensues, if the stone is not to be rendered
worse instead of better.
Therefore it is best in such cases to polish the ends of the stone with
pumice stone till all dirt is gone, and then to etch with diluted acid
and prepare anew with gum arabic.
To be sure, it is possible to dip a clean woolen rag in strong, even
pure acid, and thus etch dirt away from the ends; but great care is
necessary that no drop may touch the design, as the ink that adheres to
the latter is not strong enough to resist the acid. In thus cleansing
the plate, the roughening is etched away by the violent action, and a
new polish is obtained.
Still, in either method of cleaning dirty places, great care must be
taken not to touch roughly, press, or rub with dirty fatty rags or with
dirty, fatty fingers before the gum arabic is on it. The acid eats away
all the previous material used in preparation, and leaves the plate
practically in its clean, natural state. Consequently it will take on
grease readily, and the application of gum is essential.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account