As the transfer from paper to stone depended mainly on the greater or
lesser powers of adhesion between one material and another, it was
natural that in my many experiments with such various ingredients I
should observe that a mucous fluid, as, for instance, the gum solution,
resisted the adhesion of the greasy ink. Nearer still to the new
invention did the following experiment bring me: I noticed that if there
happened to be a few drops of oil in the water into which I dipped paper
inscribed with my greasy stone-ink, the oil would distribute itself
evenly over all parts of the writing, whereas the rest of the paper
would take no oil, and especially so if it had been treated with gum
solution or very thin starch paste. This fact led me to investigate the
behavior of paper printed with common printing-ink.
A sheet of an old book was drawn through thin gum solution, then laid on
a stone and touched carefully everywhere with a sponge that had been
dipped into a thin oil color. The printed letters took the color well
everywhere and the paper itself remained white. Now I laid another clean
white sheet on this, put both through the press, and obtained a very
good transfer, in reverse, of course. In this manner, if I used great
care, I found I could make fifty and more transfers from the same sheet.
If I allowed such a transfer to dry thoroughly and then treated it like
the original sheet, why should it not produce transfers that are like
the original, not reversed? So thought I, and the result showed that I
had not been wrong! Only for the first transfer I needed to use a
somewhat stiffer color that had been dried more with litharge of silver,
and then to let the transfer dry for at least four or six days.
So I came to find that I could print without a stone, from the paper
alone; and this process, depending solely on chemical action, was
totally, fundamentally different from all other processes of printing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account