The Invention of Printing.: A Collection of Facts and Opinions, Descriptive of Early Prints and Playing Cards, the Block-Books of the Fifteenth Century, the Legend of Lourens Janszoon Coster, of Haarlem, and the Work of John Gutenberg and His AssociatesDe Vinne, Theodore Low
History
The Invention of Printing.: A Collection of Facts and Opinions, Descriptive of Early Prints and Playing Cards, the Block-Books of the Fifteenth Century, the Legend of Lourens Janszoon Coster, of Haarlem, and the Work of John Gutenberg and His Associates
De Vinne, Theodore Low
Incunabula -- Bibliography; Printing -- History -- Origin and antecedents
On the sixth day of November, 1455, Fust brought a suit for the
recovery of the money advanced to Gutenberg. As Gutenberg was unable to
pay the demand, we may suppose that the _Bible_ had not been completed,
or, had not met with a ready sale. The suit of John Fust has been the
occasion of discordant criticism. Dibdin fully justifies his action,
and intimates that Gutenberg was really a trickster, who would have
defrauded Fust if he had not resorted to summary proceedings. The
defenders of Fust, who are few, have to admit that he here appears
as a keen man of business, destitute of sentiment, and of ungenerous
disposition. Sympathizers with Gutenberg denounce Fust as a cunning
schemer, who had made the terms of the partnership rigorous with
the secret determination to get possession of the invention through
Gutenberg’s inability to keep his contract.
This is the record of the proceedings before the court: [p426]
INSTRUMENT of a certain day, when Fust produced an account and
confirmed it by an oath. In the name of God. Amen. Be it known to all
who shall see this public document or hear it read, that, in the year
of our Lord 1455, on Thursday, the 6th of November, between eleven and
twelve at noon, at Mentz, in the large dining-hall _(refectorium)_ of
the convent of bare-footed friars, appeared before me, notary, and
the witnesses to be mentioned hereafter, the honorable and prudent
man Jacob Fust, citizen of Mentz, and has, in behalf of Johan Fust
his brother, also present, shewn, said and exposed, that to the said
Johan Fust on the one side and Johan Gutenberg on the other, should
be administered the oath, according to judgment passed on both the
parties, and for which this day and this hour had been fixed and
the hall of the convent assigned. In order that the friars of the
said convent, who were still assembled in the hall, should not be
disturbed, the said Jacob Fust did ask through his messenger, whether
Johan Gutenberg, or any one for him, were present in the convent,
in order to finish the matter. At this message came into the said
refectorium the reverend Heinrich Gunther, pastor of St. Christopher’s
at Mentz, Heinrich Keffer, and Bertolf von Hanau, a servant of Johan
Gutenberg, and when they had been asked by Johan Fust whether they
had been authorized by Johan Gutenberg, they answered that they had
been sent by Junker Johan Gutenberg to hear and see what should happen
in this case. Thereupon Johan Fust begged leave to conform to the
stipulations of the verdict, after he had waited for Johan Gutenberg
till twelve o’clock, and was still waiting for him. He reads the
sentence passed on the first article of his claim, from word to word,
with its pretension and response, which runs as follows: First, that
he, according to the written agreement, should lend Johan Gutenberg
about 800 florins in gold, _with which he was to finish the work, and
whether it would cost more or less was no matter to Fust_; and that
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account