The Invention of Printing.: A Collection of Facts and Opinions, Descriptive of Early Prints and Playing Cards, the Block-Books of the Fifteenth Century, the Legend of Lourens Janszoon Coster, of Haarlem, and the Work of John Gutenberg and His AssociatesDe Vinne, Theodore Low
History
The Invention of Printing.: A Collection of Facts and Opinions, Descriptive of Early Prints and Playing Cards, the Block-Books of the Fifteenth Century, the Legend of Lourens Janszoon Coster, of Haarlem, and the Work of John Gutenberg and His Associates
De Vinne, Theodore Low
Incunabula -- Bibliography; Printing -- History -- Origin and antecedents
Discovery of the Book of Four Stories, with Imprint of Albert Pfister
. . . Its Types the same as those of the Bible of 36 lines . . .
Pfister regarded as an Inventor of Printing . . . Description of
Book of Four Stories . . . Its Colophon . . . Book of Fables . . .
Colophon and Fac-simile . . . Other Books by Pfister . . . Pfister
not a Type-founder . . . Probably an Engraver on Wood . . . Could not
have Printed the Bible of 36 lines . . . Pfister probably got his
Knowledge of Printing from Gutenberg . . . Paul of Prague’s Notice of
Printing at Bamberg . . . Sebastian Pfister . . . Pamphilo Castaldi
. . . Absurdity of the Legend . . . John Mentel and his Epitaph . . .
Gebwiler’s Statement . . . Fac-simile of the Arms of the Typothetæ
. . . Specklin’s Statement . . . Plain Falsifications of History . . .
Known Facts about Mentel and his partner Henry Eggestein.
* * * * *
It is, perhaps, possible to show of all inventions that somewhere
somebody must have been very near to it. To assert of any invention
whatever, that it could or should have been invented long ago, is
nothing but chicane: we are to prove, incontrovertibly, that it was
really invented, or else be silent.
_Lessing._
* * * * *
Schelhorn’s opinion that the _Bible of 36 lines_ was the Bible
described by Zell—the book printed by Gutenberg in 1450—did not meet
with the approval of those who had copies of the _Bible of 42 lines_.
Men who had paid very large prices for the copies of an edition
supposed to be the first, were loth to have it degraded to the inferior
place of a second edition. The testimony of Zell was unceremoniously
set aside; the written date of 1460 in one copy of the _Bible of 36
lines_ was regarded as indicating the date of printing, and the book
was declared the work of Gutenberg between 1455 and 1460. Another
hypothesis was soon presented. In 1792, Steiner, a clergyman at
Augsburg, announced the discovery of the _Book of Four Stories_ with
the imprint of Albert [p481] Pfister, Bamberg, 1462. Soon after, Camus
read before the National Institute at Paris, a critical description
of the book, in which he proved the identity of its types with those
of the _Bible of 36 lines_. Thereupon, incautious readers rushed to
the hasty inference that, as Pfister had made use of the types of the
_Bible of 36 lines_, the Bible must have been printed by Pfister.
Critics of authority did not hesitate to say that Albert Pfister, a
printer unknown for three centuries, and of whom there is no tradition,
might have been an inventor of printing, the rival, and perhaps the
predecessor and teacher, of John Gutenberg. As we know Pfister only
through his books, it will be proper to examine their workmanship
before this hypothesis can be considered. They are not numerous:
sixteen books and pamphlets have been attributed to him, but his claim
to eight has been disproved.[334]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account