[11] Considerable controversy has taken place as to the actual meaning
of this word. Various suggestions have been made, more generally by
local writers, and in the confusion it is difficult to come to a final
decision. The latest authorities prefer Gray Snow, and the task would be
considerable to enumerate all those who have written on the subject. W.
W. Hildreth in _Annals of Iowa_, April, 1864, gives the derivation from
the Omaha word Py-ho-ja, or “Grey Snow.” It has been claimed that the
word is of Dakota origin and that it was written by the French Aiouez
(see Charlevoix, 1723) and that its anglicization was gradual. The
present meaning of _Iowa_ in the Dakota is “something to write or paint
with.” Schoolcraft is authority for the statement that the tribes called
themselves Pa-ho-ches, meaning “Dusty Nose,” or “Dirty Face,” and Foster
in the text emphasizes this point. One writer boldly asserts that the
word Iowa is a corruption from Kiowa, and Antoine Le Claire, the
celebrated half-breed interpreter, stated that the word in his tongue
signified “this is the place.” Taylor Pierce, long connected with the
trading post of Fort Des Moines, testified in favor of _Kiowa_, giving
it the same definition as last named. Fulton (RED MEN OF IOWA) mentions
certain writers who interpreted the word as “beautiful.” W. E. Richey
(MEMOIRS OF THE EXPLORATION OF THE BASIN OF THE MISSISSIPPI VALLEY,
Volume VII, 1903) says, “I feel inclined to think that the word _Iowa_
came from Harahey....” For a full discussion of this subject see _Annals
of Iowa_, April, 1864, and July, 1896.
[12] See Mooney, THE CHEYENNE INDIANS, _Mem. of the Amer. Anthro.
Assoc._ No. 1, 1907. His map as given there is especially useful.
[13] See Williamson, MINN. HIST. SOC. COLL., Vol. I, (reprint 1902),
page 242. According to this authority the Iowa were known as Ayuhba,
which form is also used by Riggs, DAKOTA GRAMMAR AND DICTIONARY, 1852.
In MEMOIRS OF EXPLORATIONS IN THE BASIN OF THE MISSISSIPPI, Vol. III,
1900, is included an excellent historical chart by N. H. Winchell
showing geographical names and other data prior to Nicollet’s Map of
1841. This shows the location of the Iowa tribe in that section between
the present southern boundary of Iowa and lower Minnesota on the east,
and along the southern bank of the Missouri river to the westward.
Catlin’s Map of 1833 places this tribe in the southwestern portion of
the State of Iowa.
[14] See note 60.
[15] For an extended account of the Recollet Father Zénobe Membré, see
Le Clercq’s FIRST ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FAITH IN NEW FRANCE, Shea’s
translation, II, 133; 1881.
[16] See Richman (I. B.). AMONG THE QUAKERS, AND OTHER SKETCHES, 3rd ed.
Contains _Mascoutin, A Reminiscence of the Nation of Fire_.
[17] Original in St. Mary’s College Archives, Montreal and reproduced in
THE JESUIT RELATIONS, published by The Burrows Brothers Co. See also
Joliet’s Map of 1674 (_ibid._ vol. LIX.) where relative positions are
practically the same.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account